FLINT POWER TOOLS (P) LTD,GURUGRAM vs. ACIT , CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, FARIDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the initiation of proceedings under Section 147 by the Assessing Officer was contrary to Section 151A of the Act. This was based on binding precedents from the Punjab & Haryana High Court in the assessee's own case for earlier assessment years.
What were the facts?
A search and seizure operation led to the reopening of the assessee's case for AY 2019-20. The Assessing Officer made additions of Rs. 36,03,436/- and Rs. 3,436/-. The CIT(A) upheld these additions.
What were the issues?
Whether the initiation of reassessment proceedings under Section 147 by the Assessing Officer was valid, considering the provisions of Section 151A and previous High Court judgments. Whether disallowances for salary and employee PF contribution were justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 148,Section 151A,Section 37,Section 36(1)(v)(a),Section 2(24)(x),Section 234B,Section 234C
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “B”: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI S RIFAUR RAHMAN & SHRI VIMAL KUMAR
PER VIMAL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
The appeal filed by the assessee is against order dated 11.11.2024 of Learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-3, Gurgaon (hereinafter referred as “the Ld. CIT(A)”) under Section 250(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ( hereinafter referred as “the Act”) arising out of assessment order dated 27.02.2024 of the Learned Assessing Officer/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle, Faridabad (hereinafter referred as “Ld. AO") under Section 147 the Act for assessment year 2019-20. 2. Brief facts of case are that a search & seizure operation under Section 132 of the Act was conducted on 10
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Jashwant Sharma vs. The Union Of INDIA And A4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026