ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. SRIDHAR PALAKURTHI, HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal corrected a typographical error where 'Assessing Officer' was mentioned instead of 'ld.CIT(A)'. The matter was remanded back to the CIT(A) for fresh examination and a detailed speaking order.
What were the facts?
This is a corrigendum to a previous order by the ITAT Hyderabad Bench concerning appeals for AY 2018-19 and 2019-20. A typographical error was identified in paragraph 13.2 of the original order.
What were the issues?
The core issue was a typographical error in the previous order, leading to a correction and remand for further examination by the lower appellate authority.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
The above captioned appeals were disposed of by the Tribunal by a common order dated 09.10.2023. It is noticed that in Paragraph 13.2 of the said order, the word “Assessing Officer” was wrongly mentioned instead of “ld.CIT(A)”, which is an inadvertent typographical mistake. Therefore, the same is hereby corrected.
Accordingly, the last line in the said paragraph (13.2) may be read as “In the light of the above, we deem it appropriate to remand back the matter to the file of ld.CIT(A) to examine afresh and pass a detailed speaking order.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shivaraj M S vs. The Union Of INDIAKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
