DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-1, NAGPUR vs. M/S NIHAL GITS PVT.LTD , NAGPUR

ITA 95/NAG/2018Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 October 2024AY 2012-2013Bench: SHRI V. DURGA RAO (Judicial Member)18 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the receipt of share premium on the issue of fresh shares is a capital receipt and not chargeable to tax. The provisions of Section 56(2)(viib) and the proviso to Section 68 were not applicable for the assessment year 2012-13.

What were the facts?

The Assessing Officer added the share premium received by the assessee company as income, considering it a non-genuine transaction. The assessee argued that the share premium was on capital account and that any issue with the shareholders should be addressed in their individual assessments.

What were the issues?

Whether share premium received by a company is taxable as income, and whether the provisions of Section 56(2)(viib) and the proviso to Section 68 are applicable retrospectively.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 68,Section 56(2)(viib)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(17)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

Before: SHRI V. DURGA RAO & SHRI K.M. ROY, ACCOUNTANT, MEMBER

For Appellant: Shri Abhay Agrawal
For Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe

PER K.M. ROY, A.M.

The Reve

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 68

All 29,931 judgments and leading authorities on Section 68 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →