MRS BESSIE HENRY @ MALLTHUMBA BHA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
What did the High Court hold?
The tribunal noted the submission that the direction has been complied with. Consequently, the contempt petitions were closed.
What were the facts?
The complainants filed contempt petitions alleging disobedience of a High Court order. The Additional Government Advocate submitted that the direction has been complied with.
What were the issues?
Whether the accused have complied with the order of the High Court. The issue is whether contempt proceedings should be initiated for alleged disobedience of a court order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 04TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2012 PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K.SREEDHAR RAO AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.MANOHAR C.C.C. No.589/2012(CIVIL) AND C.C.C.Nos.689-691/2012(CIVIL) BETWEEN: 1. MRS. BESSIE HENRY @ MALLTHUMBA BHA AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.10 ALL SAINTS CHURCH COMPOUND NO.1, HOSUR ROAD BANGALORE-560 025 2. MRS. BIMLA PHILIPS AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.153(54) 3E MAIN ROAD, KACHARAKANAHALLI THOMAS TOWN BANGALORE-560 084 3. MRS. B.V. RAMANA KUMARI AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.32
2 2ND CROSS, 2ND STAGE KIRLOSKAR COLONY BASAVESHWARNAGAR BANGALORE-560 079 4. MR. SANNAYANAIAY M AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.74, SHABARI INCOME TAX LAYOUT BHARATHINARGAR VISHWANEEDAM POST BANGALORE-560 091 ... COMPLAINANTS (BY SRI K.HANUMANTHARAYAPPA, ADV.,) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF SECONDARY EDUCATION M.S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY SRI. KUMARA NAIK 2. THE COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF SECONDARY EDUCATION NEW PUBLIC OFFICES NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BANGALORE-560 001 REPRESENTED BY SRI. PRABHAKAR 3. THE DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION NEW PUBLIC OFFICES NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
3 BANGALORE-560 001 REPRESENTED BY SRI. HANUMANTHARAYAPPA 4. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS BM NORTH DIVISION K.R.CIRCLE BANGALORE REPRESENTED BY SRI.CHANDRASHEKARAIAH 5. THE HEAD MASTER GOODWILL GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL NO.10, PROMENADE ROAD FRAZER TOWN BANGALORE-560 005 6. THE HEAD MASTER SEVASHRAM HIGH SCHOOL SRIRAMPURAM BANGALORE-560 021 ... ACCUSED (BY SRI. V.S. HEGDE, AGA FOR A1 TO A4) THESE CCC ARE FILED U/S 11 & 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHEREIN HE PRAYS THAT THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT BE PLEASED TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR DISOBEYING THE ORDER DATED 30.03.2012 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT IN W.P.NO.9281/2012(S-RES). THESE CCC COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, ON THIS DAY, SREEDHAR RAO, J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
4 O R D E R Learned Additional Government Advocate submits that direction has been complied. Hence, these petitions are closed. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE PMR*
More judgments on Section 11
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 531/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 530/NAG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026