POLIPALLI FARMERS SERVICE CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD,VIZIANAGARAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, VIZIANAGARAM

PDF · subscribers
ITA 218/VIZ/2023Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam20 February 2024AY 2018-19Bench: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, HON’BLE (Judicial Member)3 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the appeal was filed belatedly and no condonation petition was submitted. Therefore, the appeal was not maintainable.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT with a delay of 156 days. No petition was filed by the assessee to condone this delay.

What were the issues?

Maintainability of an appeal filed beyond the prescribed limitation period without a condonation petition.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM “SMC” BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM

Before: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, HON’BLE

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, AR
Hearing: 06.02.2024Pronounced: 20.02.2024

अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant by : Shri G.V.N.Hari, AR प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent by : Dr.Aparna Villuri, DR सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date of Hearing 06.02.2024 : घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date of Pronouncement : 20.02.2024 आदेश /O R D E R

Per Shri Duvvuru RL Reddy, Judicial Member :

1.

This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)], National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi in DIN & Order No.ITBA/ NFAC/S/250/2022-23/1048441004(1) dated 04.01.2023, arising out of order passed u/s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘Act’) dated 31.05.2019 for the Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2018-19 with the delay of 156 days.

The Polepalli Farmers Service Co-operative Society Ltd.,Vizianagaram

2.

The Ld.DR brought to our notice that the appeal was filed belatedly and no condonation petition was filed. Therefore the appeal is not maintainable.

3.

The Ld.AR replied that the assessee society has not shown any interest to file a petition to condone the delay of 156 days. 4. I have heard both the parties and perused the material available on record. It is evident from the records that the order of the Ld.CIT(A)dated 04.01.2023 was issued and served on the assessee on 04.01.2023 and the appeal against the order of the Ld.CIT(A) ought to have been filed by the assessee before the Tribunal on or before 03.03.2023, but the appeal was filed on 08.08.2023 with the delay of 156 days. No condonation petition was filed by the assessee for condoning the delay. Hence, the appeal is not maintainable and liable to be dismissed. Therefore, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed in-mine. 5. In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed in-limine.

Order pronounced in the open court on 20th February, 2024. (दुव्वूरु आर.एल रेड्डी) (DUVVURU RL REDDY) न्याधयक सदस्य/JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated : 20.02.2024 L.Rama, SPS

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →