DCIT CIR 7(1), MUMBAI vs. INDIABULLS RETAIL SERVICE LTD, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that there was a direct nexus between the borrowed funds and the interest income earned from lending. Therefore, the interest paid on borrowings is an admissible deduction against the interest income.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed deduction for interest expenses incurred on borrowed funds, arguing a direct nexus between these funds and interest-bearing loans advanced to other companies. The Assessing Officer disallowed this deduction, stating the borrowed funds were for the assessee's projects and not directly linked to earning interest income.
What were the issues?
Whether interest paid on borrowed funds is deductible under Section 57(iii) when such funds were lent to other companies, and there is a direct nexus between the borrowing and lending activities.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(14)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Cheminvest Ltd. v. CIT1,569 citing61 Taxmann.com 118 · 2015 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Winsome Textile Industries Ltd.378 citing319 ITR 204 · 2009 · HC
- REI Agro Ltd. v. DCIT346 citing35 Taxmann.com 404 · 2013 · ITAT
- Cheminvest Ltd. v. ITO338 citing121 ITD 318 · 2009 · ITAT
- CIT v. Shivam Motors (P.) Ltd.179 citing55 Taxmann.com 262 · 2015 · HC
- CIT v. Holcim India (P.) Ltd.138 citing57 Taxmann.com 28 · 2015 · HC
- CIT v. Oriental Structural Engineers Pvt. Ltd.66 citing35 Taxmann.com 210 · 2013 · HC
- Asstt. CIT v. Spray Engineering Devices Ltd.39 citing23 Taxmann.com 267 · 2012
- Gareware Wall Ropes Ltd. v. ACIT22 citing46 Taxmann.com 18 · 2014 · ITAT
- CIT v. Cinceita Private Limited18 citing137 ITR 652 · 1982 · HC
- Shiva Industries & Holdings Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income17 citing11 Taxmann.com 404 · 2011
- TGV Projects & Investments Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT ITAT, Hyderabad8 citing26 Taxmann.com 43
- Richardson Hindustan Ltd. v. CIT7 citing169 ITR 516 · 1988 · HC
- 118 Delhi HC 2 CIT v. Shivam Motors (P.) Ltd.5 citing50 Taxmann.com 138 · 2014 · HC
Heard together (3 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, म ुंबई न्यायपीठ “आई” म ुंबई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “I” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SHAILENDRA KUMAR YADAV, JM AND SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, AM आयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.1165/Mum/2014 (ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2008-09)
Dy.Commissioner of Income बनधम/ M/s Indiabulls Retail Service Ltd, Tax-7(1), Room No.622, (Formerly knows as Pyramid Vs.
Aayakar Bhavan, Retails Ltd, Now known as M K Road, M/s Store One Retails India Mumbai-400020 (Ltd),11th floor, Indiabulls Finance Centre, Elibhinstone road (W), Mumbai-400013 स्थधयी ऱेखध सं./ PAN : AADCP5164C आयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.5732/Mum/2014 (ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2010-11) बनधम/ M/s Indiabulls Wholesale Dy.Commissioner of Income Tax- 3(2), M-62 and 63, 1st floor, M K Road, Connaught Place, Mumbai-400020 New Delhi-110001 आयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.6081/Mum/2014 (ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2010-11)
Dy.Commissioner of Income बनधम/ M/s Indiabulls Wholesale Tax-3(2), Tower No.1, plot No.612-613, Mumbai-400020 Elibhinstone road (W), Mumbai-400013 स्थधयी ऱेखध सं./ PAN :
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 57(iii)
- Raghuraj Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs DCIT-ACIT Cirle Silchar/DCIT Circle 1…ITA 143/GTY/2026[2017-2018]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2017-2018
- Nagini Cooperative Credit Society Limited… vs ITO, Ward 6(2)(1), Bangalore, BengaluruITA 619/BANG/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
- DCIT CC 5.4, Mumbai vs Wadhwagroup Holdings Private Limited, MumbaiITA 3412/MUM/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed15 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
- DCIT CC 5.4, Mumbai vs Wadhwagroup Holdings Private Limited, MumbaiITA 3411/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed15 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- DCIT CC 5.4, Mumbai vs Wadhwagroup Holdings Private Limited, MumbaiITA 3410/MUM/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed15 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026