ANIL KUMAR (HUF) vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE,

PDF · subscribers
ITA 505/DEL/2008Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 March 2016AY 2001-20023 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeal due to non-appearance and the Revenue's appeal for being non-maintainable. However, the concluding sentence states both appeals are allowed, creating a contradiction.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal was dismissed in default as no one appeared on their behalf despite proper notice. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed as it was filed in violation of CBDT circulars and had a low tax effect.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee's appeal should be dismissed for non-appearance and whether the Revenue's appeal is maintainable given CBDT circulars and tax effect.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 268

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “G” NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI I.C. SUDHIR & SHRI O.P. KANT

For Respondent: Shri Rajiv Malhotra, CIT(DR)
Hearing: 23.03.2016

ORDER

PER I.C. SUDHIR: JUDICIAL MEMBER

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →