SH. SANJEEV KUMAR,DELHI vs. PR. CIT, NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The appellants, being satisfied with the fresh assessment order, sought to withdraw their appeals. The Tribunal allowed the withdrawal of the appeals.
What were the facts?
The appellants filed appeals challenging the order of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) passed under Section 263. Subsequently, the Assessing Officer (AO) passed a fresh assessment order under Section 143(3) r.w.s. 263.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals challenging the PCIT's order under Section 263 are maintainable after a fresh assessment order has been passed and accepted by the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘F’ NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG & SHRI L.P. SAHU
PER CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER Captioned appeals have been filed against the order of the Pr. CIT, New Delhi both dated 26.3.2015 for asstt. year 2011-12. passed u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act 1961 (for short the Act). However in the beginning of the arguments the Ld. Counsel for the appellants submitted that since the AO on 29.3.2016 has passed assessment order u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 263 of the Act and the assesses are satisfied with the assessment orders passed in pursuant to the impugned order of PCIT therefore appeals do not want to further agitate the issue before this Tribunal and the appellants may kindly be allowed to withdraw these appeals. Ld. DR submitted that the department has no objection if the appellants are allowed to withdraw their appeals and appeals may kindly be dismissed as withdrawn first.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shaista Praween vs. The Assistant Commissoner Of GST And Central Excise, RourkelaOrissa · 6 Nov 2026
- Paonta Hp Centre vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 5 Nov 2026
- M/S Multitech Agro INDIA (Opc) PVT LTD vs. The State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 5 Nov 2026
- Gopa Satya Madhava Subbarao vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 5 Nov 2026
- M/S Kallu Cable vs. The Commissioner State Goods And Service TaxUttarakhand · 5 Nov 2026