M/S. G T V INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. MANDIDEEP,MANDIDEEP vs. PCIT-1 BHOPAL, BHOPAL
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee sought withdrawal of the appeals before the Tribunal, having complied with the formalities of the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The Revenue had no objection to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals against the assessment orders for AYs 2009-10 and 2010-11. The assessee subsequently filed a declaration under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, to avail the benefit of the scheme.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals can be withdrawn by the assessee due to availing the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Before: MS. MADHUMITA ROY & SHRI B.M. BIYANI
PER MADHUMITA ROY, J.M.: The captioned appeals have been filed at the instance of the assessee against the order of the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Bhopal dated 18.03.2019 arising out of the order dated 30.12.2016 passed by the ITO-1(1), Bhopal under Section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 concerning A.Ys. 2009-10 & 2010-11 respectively.
When the matter was called for hearing, it is pointed out to the Bench that the assessee has filed declaration and undertaking in Form No. 3 as per provisions of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 for availment of the benefit under the scheme. In view of &600/Ind/2019 A.Ys. 2009-10 & 2010-11 Page 2 of 3 this, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that assessee does not want to pursue the said appeal owing to exercise of option for availing VSV Scheme and it has complied with the requisite formalities, and sought permission for withdrawal of appeal before the Tribunal. The Ld. Counsel has placed on record copy of Form No. 3.
3. The Ld. Departmental Representative for the Revenue stated that he has no objection to withdraw the appeals in the circumstances narrated on behalf of the assessee.
In the light of written requests made on behalf of the captioned party, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. However, in the event, the assessee fails to avail the benefit of VSV Scheme for any bonafide reasons, then the assessee concerned will be at liberty to seek restoration of original appeal for hearing before ITAT in accordance with law.
In the result, the captioned appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced as per Rule 34 of I.T.A.T. Rules 1963 on 03.08. 2022.
Sd/- Sd/- (B.M. Biyani) (Madhumita Roy) Accountant Member Judicial Member Indore, 03.08.2022 Tanmay, Sr.PS Copies to: (1) The appellant (2) The respondent (3) CIT (4) CIT(A) (5) Departmental Representative (6) Guard File By order UE COPY Assistant Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Indore Bench, Indore &600/Ind/2019 A.Ys. 2009-10 & 2010-11 Page 3 of 3
Date of taking dictation 29.07.2022
2. Date of typing & draft order placed before the Dictating Member
Date on which the approved draft comes to the Sr. P.S./P.S.
4. Date on which the fair order is placed before the Dictating Member for pronouncement
5. Date on which the file goes to the Bench Clerk
Date on which the file goes to the Head Clerk
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026