ECONOMIC PHARMACEUTICALS P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO WD 9(1)(3), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 8736/MUM/2011Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 July 2016AY 2007-082 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The Departmental Representative had no objection to the withdrawal.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. Subsequently, the assessee filed a written application requesting permission to withdraw the appeal.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee can withdraw their appeal filed before the tribunal.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 254(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Order u/s.254(1)of the Income-tax Act,1961(Act) लेखा लेखा सद�य लेखा लेखा सद�य सद�य राजे�� सद�य राजे�� राजे�� केकेकेके अनुसार राजे�� अनुसार अनुसार PER RAJENDRA, AM- अनुसार Challenging the order dated 1.11.2011 of the CIT(A)-9,Mumbaithe Assessee has filed the present appeal. 2.The assessee has filed a written application (dated 04.07.2016) requesting for permission to withdraw the appeal filed before the Tribunal.

3.

The Ld. Departmental Representative has no objection to the withdrawal of the appeal by the assessee. In these facts we allow the withdrawal of the appeal filed by the assessee before the Tribunal and accordingly the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. फलतः िनधा�रती �ारा दािखल क� गई अपील नामंजूर क� जाती है.

8736/Mum/2011(07-08)

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →