ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. AAKAR DESIGN CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CBDT circular is binding on the tax authorities. Therefore, the appeal filed by the Department was not maintainable as the tax effect was below the prescribed monetary limit.
What were the facts?
The Department filed an appeal before the ITAT. At the time of hearing, the Revenue's counsel pointed out a CBDT circular that stipulated not to file appeals where the tax effect is less than Rs. 10 lakhs. The tax effect in this appeal was below this limit.
What were the issues?
Whether the Department's appeal is maintainable before the ITAT when the tax effect is below the monetary limit prescribed by the CBDT circular.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “SMC -1/ I(2
Before: SHRI I. C. SUDHIR & SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI
Assessee by : Shri S C Malhotra CA Revenue by: Shri Subhakant Sahu Sr DR Date of Hearing 04/02/2016 Date of pronouncement 08 /04/2016 O R D E R PER PRASHANT MAHARISHI, A. M.
This appeal filed by the Department is directed against the order dated 03.08.2015of ld CIT (A)-I, New Delhi for the Assessment Year 2011-12.
At the outset of the hearing itself, the ld. DR brought to our attention that CBDT vide Circular No.21/2015 dated 10th December, 2015 has decided that the revenue would not prefer an appeal before the Tribunal if the tax effect is less than Rs.10 lakhs. Therefore, he pleaded that the appeal of the revenue be decided as per the instruction of the CBDT. Ld AR also reiterated same facts.
We have heard both the sides on the issue and perused the material. We find that the CBDT vide circular dated 10.12.2015 has revised the monetary limit for filing the appeal by the department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hon’ble High Courts and Hon’ble Supreme Court. The relevant para of the aforesaid circular is reproduced as under :- “3. Henceforth, appeals/SLPs shall not be filed in cases where the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limits given hereunder :-
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026