UNI COM FOUNDATION,JALANDHAR vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal set aside both the cancellation of 12A/12AB registration and the rejection of the 80G application, remanding the matters back to the CIT (Exemption) for a fresh decision. The tribunal directed the assessee to provide all necessary details and evidence of its activities, and the CIT(E) to provide adequate opportunities for hearing.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Unicom Foundation, had its registration under Section 12AA r.w.s. 12AB and its application for 80G approval cancelled by the CIT (Exemption). The CIT(E) doubted the genuineness of the assessee's charitable activities, particularly regarding the utilization of CSR funds and their accounting treatment, noting that 98% of funds were transferred to a single entity and other activities were negligible.
What were the issues?
The key legal issues were the genuineness of the assessee's charitable activities, the proper accounting treatment of CSR funds for exemption purposes, and whether the assessee was given a fair opportunity to present its case before the CIT(E).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR.
Before: DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE & SH. UDAYAN DASGUPTA
Per: DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, A.M.: These are two appeals filed by the Assessee against the separate orders of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), passed u/s 12AA r.w.s. 12AB dated 19.06.2025 and 80G dated 11.12.2024. 2. The Assessee raised the following grounds of appeal:
“1. That the Id. CIT (E) erred both on facts and in law in cancelling the valid registration granted u/s 12A(1)(ac) (i) of the Act, without appreciating the bonafide and charitable nature of I.T.A. No. 605 and 29/Asr/2025 2 Assessment Year: N/A the Appellant's activities and without establishing any violation of the conditions specified under the Act
That the Ld. CIT (E) e
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- A.Merchy Clara vs. The Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise (Appeals)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- Nallathambi Thangaraj vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IMadras · 13 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S. Hira Films PVT. LTD. vs. M/S. Prasad Film Labs (Mumbai) Private LimitedBombay · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Jung Bahadur Singh, Through Its Proprietor, Jang Bahadur Singh vs. The Union Of INDIA, Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of RevenueJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026