UMAR MOHD,HARYANA vs. ITO WARD 4(4) GURGAON, GURGAON

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2391/DEL/2025Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 October 2025AY 2018-19Bench: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member), SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA (Judicial Member)3 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the impugned orders did not clearly indicate whether proper notices were served to the assessee. For the sake of justice, the Tribunal restored the issues to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeals were dismissed by the lower authorities because the assessee did not appear for the hearing and failed to file submissions. The assessee contended that they were not given an opportunity to contest the merits of the case.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee was provided adequate opportunity to be heard and contest the merits of the case before the lower authorities.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3),Section 272A(1)(d),Section 270A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES: A : NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN & SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA

For Appellant: Shri Mohit Chaudhary, CA &, Ms Neha Gupta, Advocate
For Respondent: Shri Ajay Kumar Arora, Sr.DR
Hearing: 28.10.2025Pronounced: 30.10.2025

ORDER PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM: These are appeals preferred by the Assessee against the orders of the Ld. First Appellate Authority in appeals filed before him against the orders of the ld. Assessing Officer (hereinafter referred to as the Ld. AO, for short). Further details of the orders of the lower authorities are as under:- ITA No. & CIT(A) Appeal No. & AO who passed Section of Assessment [ld. FAA] Date of order of the assessment the IT Act Year who the CIT(A) order & Date of under which passed the order the AO order passed the order 2389/Del/2025 CIT(A)-3, CIT(A), GGN- ITO, Ward-4(4), 143(3) 2017-18 Gurgaon 1/10975/2019-20, Gurgaon. dated ITAs No.2389 to 2392/Del/2025 Dated 10.02.2025 06.12.2019 - - 2390/Del/2025 Do- NFAC/2017- AO, NeAC, dated Do - 2018-19 18/10229003, 24.03.2021 dated 10.02.2025 - 2391/Del/2025 Do- NFAC/2017- AO, NeAC, dated 272A(1)(d) 2018-19 18/10229805 11.01.2022 dated 10.02.2025 2392/Del/2025 - Do- NFAC/10229804, AO, NeAC, dated 270A 2018-19 dated 10.02.2025 14.01.2022 2. On hearing both the sides and appreciating the material on record, we find that the assessee was not represented at the time of hearing and the appeal was dismissed on the basis that the assessee has failed to appear and file the submissions. The assessee has raised specific ground that he was not given opportunity to contest on merits. The impugned orders do not reflect as to if the notices were served to the knowledge of the assessee. Thus for ends of justice, without prolonging the matter further, we consider it an appropriate case to restore the issues on merits as well as on law to the files of the ld.CIT(A) with the direction to serve a notice afresh and decide the appeals in accordance with the law. The appeals are allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 30.10.2025. Sd/- Sd/- (S. RIFAUR RAHMAN) (ANUBHAV SHARMA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 30th October, 2025. dk ITAs No.2389 to 2392/Del/2025

More judgments on Section 272A(1)(d)

All 1,125 judgments and leading authorities on Section 272A(1)(d) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →