VARDAAN INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 4(1), RAIPUR, RAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal found that the CIT(A) made a factual error in dismissing the appeal based on the VSVS scheme. It set aside the CIT(A)'s order and remitted the matter back for a fresh adjudication on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal against a re-opened assessment order was dismissed by the CIT(A) on the erroneous assumption that the assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme (VSVS) against the re-opened assessment. The assessee clarified that the VSVS application was filed against the original assessment, not the re-opened one.
What were the issues?
The primary legal issue was whether the CIT(A) correctly dismissed the appeal based on the assessee's participation in the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, and the validity of the re-assessment proceedings under Section 147/148.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 147,Section 148,Section 144B,Section 250,Section 68
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAIPUR BENCH, RAIPUR
Before: SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM & SHRI AVDHESH KUMAR MISHRA, AM
Per Avdhesh Kumar Mishra, AM: This appeal for Assessment Year (‘AY’) 2013-14 filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 06.11.2025 of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), [‘CIT(A)’], National Faceless Appeal Centre (‘NFAC’), Delhi passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’).
The grounds of appeal raised by the assessee
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026