CHHATTISGARH HOUSING BOARD,RAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, EXEMPTION CIRCLE,, RAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, following the Supreme Court's decision in Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority, held that the matter needs to be examined by the AO to determine if the consideration charged for housing units was substantially above cost plus a nominal mark-up.
What were the facts?
The Chhattisgarh Housing Board, registered under section 12A, claimed exemption under section 11 of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer disallowed this exemption, treating the surplus from housing activities as taxable business income, a view upheld by the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
The key issue was whether the housing board's activities constituted business or were for general public utility, impacting its eligibility for exemption under Section 11, especially in light of the proviso to Section 2(15).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(6)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- ACIT v. Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority390 citing143 Taxmann.com 278 · 2022 · SC
- CIT v. Andhra Chamber of Commerce167 citing55 ITR 722 · 1965 · SC · Read judgment
- DCIT(E) v. Jhansi Development Authority10 citing165 Taxmann.com 9 · 2024 · HC
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax v. Thanthi Trust Etc7 citing2 SCC 707 · 2001
- Chhattisgarh Housing Board v. ACIT (E), Raipur5 citing167 Taxmann.com 370 · 2024 · ITAT
- Maharashtra Cricket Association v. ACIT(E)5 citing174 Taxmann.com 381 · 2025 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAIPUR BENCH, RAIPUR
Before: SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM & SHRI AVDHESH KUMAR MISHRA, AM
Per Avdhesh Kumar Mishra, AM: Common facts and similar grounds arise in the above captioned appeals of the assessee; therefore, these appeals were heard together and are being disposed off by this common order.
These appeals for Ass
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 11
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 531/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 530/NAG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026