Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘D’, NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI S.V. MEHROTRA & SHRI H.S. SIDHU
This appeal by the Department is directed against the Order dated 28.7.2010 of Ld. CIT(A)-VIII, New Delhi pertaining to assessment year 2007-08 on the following grounds:- “
1. The order of the Ld. CIT(A) is erroneous and contrary to facts and law.
2. On the facts and in the circumstance of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 4,57,981/- made by the AO by capitalizing the expenses on leased moulds. 2.1 The ld. CIT(A) ignored the findings recorded by the AO and also ignored the fact that assessee will be deriving long term benefit by incurring the expenditure in question.
3. The appellant craves leave to add, to alter, or amend any grounds of the appeal raised above at the time of hearing.
In this case, Notice of hearing to both the parties were sent, in spite of the same, none attended on behalf of the Department, nor filed any application for adjournment. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case and the issue involved in the present Appeal, we are of the view that no useful purpose would be served to issue notice again and again to the Revenue, therefore, we are deciding the present appeal exparte qua Revenue, after hearing the Ld. AR of the assessee and perusing the records.
We find that Revenue in the Grounds of Appeal
before the Tribunal has challenged the deletion of addition of Rs. 4,57,981/- vide ground no. 2, as aforesaid.
4. From the above, we find that the tax effect in the Revenue’s Appeal is less than Rs.10,00,000/-, therefore, the Department’s Appeal is not maintainable, in view of the Circular No. 21/2015 dated 10th December, 2015 issued vide F.No. 279/Misc. 142/2007-ITJ (Pt.) by the CBDT. For the sake of convenience, the relevant para nos. 3 & 10 of the aforesaid CBDT’s Circular are reproduced as under:- “3. Henceforth, appeals/ SLPs shall not be filed in cases where the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limits given hereunder: Monetary Limit S No Appeals in Income-tax matters (in Rs) 1 Before Appellate Tribunal 10,00,000/- 2 Before High Court 20,00,000/- 3 Before Supreme Court 25,00,000/- It is clarified that an appeal should not be filed merely because the tax effect in a case exceeds the monetary limits prescribed above. Filing of appeal in such cases is to be decided on merits of the case.
This instruction will apply retrospectively to pending appeals and appeals to be filed henceforth in High Courts/ Tribunals. Pending appeals below the specified tax limits in para 3 above may be withdrawn/ not pressed. Appeals before the Supreme Court will be governed by the instructions on this subject, operative at the time when such appeal was filed.”
It is not in dispute that the Board’s instruction or directions issued to the income-tax authorities are binding on those authorities, therefore, the Department should have withdrawn/ not pressed the present Appeal, in view of the aforesaid instructions since the tax effect in the instant Appeal is less than the amount of Rs. 10 lacs, prescribed in the above said CBDT’s Instructions.
Keeping in view the CBDT Instruction No. 21/2015 dated 10th December, 2015, we are of the view that the Revenue should have withdrawn/ not pressed the instant appeal before the Tribunal. We are also of the view that the said Instructions are applicable for the pending appeals and appeals to be filed henceforth in Tribunal. Accordingly, the Revenue’s Appeal is dismissed. 7. In the result, Appeal filed by the Revenue Stands dismissed. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 09/05/2016. SD/- SD/- (S.V. MEHROTRA) (H.S. SIDHU) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 09/05/2016 *SR BHATNAGAR*