Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘E’, NEW DELHI
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘E’, NEW DELHI Before Sh. N. K. Saini, AM And Smt. Beena Pillai, JM Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Asstt. Commissioner of Income Vs Sh. Opinder Mehtani, Tax, Circle-I, Block-B, CGO Prop. M/s Opinder Mehtani Complex, NH-IV, Faridabad Works, H.No. 384, Sector-55, Now C/o M/s Imperial Auto Industries, Plot No. 94, Sector-25, Faridabad (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AQJPM7922A Assessee by : Sh. Somil Agarwal, Adv. Revenue by : Sh. P. Dam Kanunjna, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 01.06.2016 Date of Pronouncement : 03.06.2016 ORDER Per N. K. Saini, AM:
This is an appeal by the department against the order dated 24.12.2012 of ld. CIT(A), Faridabad. In the present case, it is noticed that the department in Form No. 36 has mentioned that the assessment order was passed u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) wherein the income assessed was at Rs.8,45,000/- against the returned income of Rs.6,57,050/-. It is noticed that the said assessment order was later on rectified by the AO vide order dated 26.09.2011. The department has not Opinder Mehtani filed the grounds in its appeal only recommendation of the ld. CIT, Faridabad has been furnished.
In the present case, it appears from perusal of the Form No. 36 that the grievance of the department is against the original assessment order and not against the order of the ld. CIT(A) passed on appeal of the assessee on the subsequent order u/s 154 of the Act. The mistake has not been rectified by the department even when it was directed on the occasion of the earlier hearing on 09.03.2016. Therefore, this appeal deserves to be dismissed with the rider that whenever the correct Form No. 36 is furnished and the relevant grounds are raised along with the application for recalling of the order in accordance with law, it may be restored.
In the result, appeal of the department is dismissed. (Order Pronounced in the Court on 03/06/2016)