MOTHER THERESSA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,AMALAPURAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTION CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that since the Assessing Officer had already disallowed the depreciation claim during the assessment, the CIT(E)'s order under Section 263 was not justified. Therefore, the CIT(E)'s order was quashed.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed depreciation on assets acquired through application of income. The Assessing Officer disallowed this depreciation, considering it a double deduction, but ultimately assessed income at NIL as the 85% application criteria was met. The CIT(E) invoked Section 263, directing a fresh assessment.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) was justified in invoking Section 263 when the Assessing Officer had already addressed the issue of depreciation during assessment? Whether the claim of depreciation on assets acquired through application of income constitutes a double deduction?
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Heard together (3 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, धिशाखापटणम पीठ, धिशाखापटणम IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
श्री दुव्वूरु आरएल रेड्डी, न्याधयक सदस्य एिं श्री एस बालाकृष्णन, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष BEFORE SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI S BALAKRISHNAN, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
आयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.No.163/VIZ/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2018-19) ACIT EXEMPTION CIRCLE v. Mother Theressa Educational Society Near RED Bridge NH-216 Stalin Corporate Building Andhra Pradesh - 533201 Autonagar Vijayawada - 520007, Andhra Pradesh [PAN: AAAAM4660P]
(अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)
सी.ओ सं. / C.O. No. 01/VIZ/2024 [आयकअपीलसं. से उत्पन्न / ARISING OUT OF I.T.A. No. 163/VIZ/2024 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2018-19)] Mother Theressa Educational Society v. The Asst. CIT Exemption Circle Income Tax Office, C.R. Building “Annexe” Chaitanya Nagar, Near RED Bridge M.G. Road, Vijayawada – 520007 NH-6, Amalapuram East Godavri District – 533201 Andhra Pradesh [PAN: AAAAM4660P] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)
I.T.A. Nos. 163&229/VIZ/2024 C.O. No. 01/VIZ/2024 Mother Theressa Educational Society आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.229 /VIZ/2024 (
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 11
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 531/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 530/NAG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026