SAMAJOTHAN GRAMODYOG SAMITI,UTTAR PRADESH vs. ITO, MORADABAD

Date of Hearing 31.08.2016 Date of Pronouncement 30.09.2016 ORDER PER DIVA SINGH, JM The present appeal alongwith the Stay Application has been filed by the assessee assailing the correctness of the order dated 9th March 2016 by CIT(A) Muradabad. However, at the time of hearing no one present on behalf of the assessee . The appeal was passed over. In the second round also, the position remained the same. Neither any one was present nor request for adjournment has been passed before the Bench. The record shows that the defect in shortage of Tribunal fee pointed out by the Registry remains not cured till date which fact was pointed out by the Registry on 30th May 2016. The appeal came up for hearing on 01.06.2016; 29.06.2016 and 12.07.2016 and on two occasions the assessee remained unrepresented and on 29.06.2016 adjournment was moved. Till date, the defect remains on record. In the absence of any efforts to cure the defect pointed out by the assessee in the afore-mentioned peculiar facts and circumstances it can be safely presumed that the assessee is not serious in pursuing the appeal filed. Respectfully following the appeal of the assessee is dismissed.