RAJATGIRI OIL INDUSTRIES,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the CIT(A)'s observations and findings regarding the various grounds of appeal. The assessee failed to provide sufficient evidence or rebut the findings of the lower authorities.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals against orders of the CIT(A) concerning multiple assessment years. The appeals involved issues related to the validity of reopening assessments, disallowance of depreciation, and additions on account of commission, rent, and other expenses.
What were the issues?
The primary issues concerned the validity of reopening assessments under Section 147 and the allowability of various expenses, including depreciation, commission, and rent, which were disallowed by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the CIT(A).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH KOLKATA
Before: SHRI SANJAY GARG & SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
All these captioned appeals filed by the assessee are against the separate orders of Ld. CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi vide order nos. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022-23/1049366817(1), ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022-23/1049366568(1), ITBA/NFAC/S/250/ 2022-23/1049366396(1) & ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022-23/1049366171 (1), all dated 02.02.2023 passed against the assessment order by ACIT, Circle-28, Kolkata, dated 29,12,2016 u/s.
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026