DAYARAM,FARIDABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1), FARIDABAD, FARIDABAD
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRAAssessment Year: 2018-19 Sh. Dayaram, H. No. 181, Vill.- Palwali Khedikalan, Near Sector 88, Faridabad Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), Faridabad PAN: BOHPD2412K (Appellant)
PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JM
This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2018-19, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National
Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-25/1072763908(1), dated
31.01.2025 involving proceedings under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).
Heard both the parties. Case file perused.
Assessee by Sh. D.C. Garg, CA
Department by Sh. Manish Gupta, Sr. DR
Date of hearing
03.11.2025
Date of pronouncement
03.11.2025
2 | P a g e
Learned counsel submits that on account of communication gaps at various levels, the assessee could not appear to plead and prove all the relevant facts in the lower appellate proceedings and therefore, larger interest of justice would be met, in case, the matter may be restored back to the Assessing Officer. The Revenue vehemently support the learned lower authorities action making addition(s) herein on merits. 3. Be that as it may, the fact remains that possibility of some communication gaps at various levels in such an instance could not be altogether ruled out. It is therefore deemed appropriate in the larger interest of justice to restore the assessee’s instant appeal back to the Assessing Officer for his afresh appropriate adjudication, within three effective opportunities of hearing at the appellant’s risk and responsibility, in consequential proceedings. Ordered accordingly. 4. This assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes Order pronounced in the open court on 3rd November, 2025 3 | P a g e (NAVEEN CHANDRA) JUDICIAL MEMBER
Dated: 11th November, 2025. RK/-