M/S. GALAXY NIRMAAN PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT held that the CIT(A) is obligated to pass a reasoned order, even if the assessee does not appear. Dismissing an appeal solely for non-prosecution without reasons is unsustainable in law.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was dismissed by the CIT(A) in default as the assessee sought an adjournment and did not appear thereafter. The assessee appealed this dismissal to the ITAT.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) can dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution without providing a reasoned order, and whether the ITAT can restore the appeal to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision on merits.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH - ‘SMC’ NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI
This appeal by the assessee has been directed against the order of Ld.
CIT(A) – 4, Delhi dated 21.11.2016 for assessment year 2012-13.
Ld. CIT(A) noted in the appellate order that assessee sought adjournment but thereafter nobody attended the appeal was accordingly dismissed in default.
2. After hearing Ld. Representatives of both the parties, I am of the view matter requires reconsideration at the level of Ld. CIT(A). According to Section 250 (6) of I.T. Act, Ld. CIT(A) is required to pass reasoned order give reasons for the decision in the appellate order. Therefore even if assessee did not appear before him, Ld. CIT(A) is under obligation to pass the order giving reasons for the same. If Ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of assessee for non prosecution only, such order cannot be sustained in law. The matter therefore requires reconsideration. I accordingly set aside the impugned order and restore the appeal of the assessee to his file with direction to re-decide appeal of assessee on merits giving reasons for decision in the appellate order by giving reasonable sufficient opportunity of being heard to the assessee.
In the result appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Pronounced in the Open Court.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026