PUSHPANJALI MEDI INDIA (P) LTD. ,KOLKATA vs. ITO,WARD-2(1),KOLKATA. , KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that as per the amalgamation scheme, all taxes including TDS belonging to the transferor company from the appointed date are to be treated as belonging to the transferee company. Therefore, the assessee is entitled to the TDS credit.
What were the facts?
The assessee company claimed credit for TDS amounting to Rs. 6,12,488/- belonging to a transferor company that had amalgamated with it. The amalgamation scheme was approved by the NCLT with an appointed date of April 1, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether TDS credit of an amalgamated transferor company can be claimed by the transferee company post amalgamation, as per the approved scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Marshall Sons & Co. (India) Ltd. v. ITO29 citing223 ITR 809 · 1997 · SC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH KOLKATA
Before: SHRI MANISH BORAD & SHRI SONJOY SARMA
PER SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
Both these appeals have been preferred by the assessee against the separate orders of the Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax, Appeals, National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as ‘the CIT(A)’], both dated 30.07.2023 passed u/s. 250 of the Income- tax Act, 1961 hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ passed against the intimation u/s. 154 r.w.s. 143(1) of the Act for the AYs 2021-22 and 2022-23 respectively. Since grounds are common and facts are identical, we dispose of both the appeals by this c
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026