GARUDA MARKETING ASSOCIATES,THRISSUR vs. THE ITO WARD 2(2), THRISSUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that while the assessee's conduct was uncooperative, the payments made in the succeeding year through banking channels warranted further verification. The matter was remitted to the AO for verification of payments for 12 out of 14 creditors.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a wholesale dealer, had sundry credits of Rs. 34.73 lakhs in its balance sheet. The assessee failed to provide confirmations for these creditors during assessment and appeal proceedings. The Assessing Officer added the amount to the returned income.
What were the issues?
Whether unconfirmed sundry credits can be added to income, and if payments made in the subsequent year can be considered as evidence of existing liability.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 68,Section 41(1),Section 69A,Section 28(i)/(iv)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(7)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Kedarnath Jute Mfg. Co. Ltd. v. CIT654 citing82 ITR 363 · 1971 · SC · Read judgment
- Roshan Di Hatti v. CIT477 citing107 ITR 938 · 1977 · SC · Read judgment
- Sutlej Cotton Mills Ltd. v. CIT409 citing116 ITR 1 · 1979 · SC · Read judgment
- 7. CIT v. MR.P.FIRM.MUAR127 citing56 ITR 67 · 1965 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Shri Vardhman Overseas Ltd.76 citing343 ITR 408 · 2012 · HC · Read judgment
- (Union of India v. Rai Deb Singh Bist20 citing88 ITR 200 · 1973 · SC
- B.M. Malani v. CIT14 citing306 ITR 196 · 2008 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN
Before: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das
Per Sanjay Arora, AM The instant appeal by the Assessee is directed against the order dated 23.01.2023 by the Commissioner of Income-tax, NFAC [CIT(A)], partly allowing the assessee’s appeal contesting it’s assessment under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) dated 23.11.2016 for Assessment Year (AY) 2014-15. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee-firm’s, a wholesale dealer in food products, etc., balance sheet as at the end of the relevant year reflected sundry credits at Rs.34.73 lakhs comprising 14 creditors, which the assessee was in assessment proceedings required to confirm. The assessee, despite sufficient opportunity do so,
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- A.Merchy Clara vs. The Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise (Appeals)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- Nallathambi Thangaraj vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IMadras · 13 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S. Hira Films PVT. LTD. vs. M/S. Prasad Film Labs (Mumbai) Private LimitedBombay · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Jung Bahadur Singh, Through Its Proprietor, Jang Bahadur Singh vs. The Union Of INDIA, Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of RevenueJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026