LAKHAN SINGH,INDORE vs. ITO-1(4), INDORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 543/IND/2019Status: DisposedITAT Indore10 November 2022AY 2010-114 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal admitted the valuation report as additional evidence. It held that the issue needed to be re-adjudicated by the CIT(A) after considering this evidence and providing an opportunity to the assessee.

What were the facts?

Assessees sold agricultural land and sought to use a valuation report for cost of acquisition. The CIT(A) did not admit this report as additional evidence. The appeals were filed against the orders of the CIT(A) and AO.

What were the issues?

Whether the valuation report should be admitted as additional evidence and whether the CIT(A) should re-examine the issue of cost of acquisition based on this evidence.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 50C,Section 144,Section 147

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE

Before: Ms. MADHUMITA ROY & SHRI BHAGIRATH MAL BIYANI

For Respondent: Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr.D.R
Hearing: 16.09.2022

Heard together (4 matters)

I.T.A. No.529/Ind/2019
I.T.A. No.541/Ind/2019
I.T.A. No.542/Ind/2019
I.T.A. No.543/Ind/2019

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

PER Ms. MADHUMITA ROY - JM:

1.

The instant four appeals filed by four different assessees are directed against the orders all dated 19.02.2019 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Indore (in short ‘CIT(A)’), arising out of the orders all dated 31.10.2017 passed by the Income Tax Officer-1(4), Indore under section 144 r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred as to ‘the Act’) for Assessment Year 2010-11.

(in case of Shri Satpal Singh) :

2.

The addition of Rs.31,90,400/- under Section 50C of the Act is under challenge before us. , 541 to 543/Ind/2019 (Shri Bharat Singh & Ors.) - 3 - 3. The brief facts of the case is this that the assessee with four other co- sellers has sold out agricultural land at Village-Niranjanpur, being an ancestral agricultural land on 21.04.2009 for a total consideration of Rs.1,59,52,000/-; the co-sharers are three brothers and mother and each received Rs.31,90,400/-. The sale deed was registered on 27.02.2008 pertaining to A.Y. 2008-09. There was practically no sale of land for the year under consideration and therefore, no long term capital gain arise in A.Y. 2010-11. In support of the contention made by the assessee the documents mainly the valuation report has been placed before the Ld.CIT(A) by way of an additional evidence which has not been admitted by the said authorities. Such reports were submitted for the purpose of cost of acquisition. Since the same was before the Ld.AO was not found to be sufficient, the said particular documents were not admitted by the Ld.CIT(A). This being the first ground taken by the assessee before us which goes to the root of the matter. Thus, keeping in view this particular aspect of the matter, we find that the said documents is required to be admitted for proper adjudication of the issue itself and thus, the same is duly admitted by us.

4.

However, in our considered view, this particular document needs to be taken care of by the Ld.CIT(A) itself for proper adjudication of the issue. Hence, we dispose of this appeal by remitting the issue to the file of the Ld.CIT(A) to re-consider the same afresh upon providing opportunity of being heard to the assessee and also upon taking into consideration this particular additional evidence and any other evidence which the assessee may choose to file at the time of hearing of the matter and pass a reasoned order thereon.

5.

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes. , 541 to 543/Ind/2019 (Shri Bharat Singh & Ors.) - 4 -

6.

The grounds of appeal as argued by the Ld. AR in 542 & 543/Ind/2019 are identical to that of the issue already been dealt with by us in ITA No.541/Ind/2019 (in case of Shri Satpal Singh) for A.Y. 2010-11 and in the absence of any changed circumstances the same shall apply mutatis mutandis. Hence, these grounds of appeal preferred by the assessee in ITA Nos. 529, 542 & 543/Ind/2019 are allowed for statistical purposes.

7.

In the combined result, all captioned appeals of assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.

This Order pronounced on 11 /10/2022

Sd/- Sd/- (BHAGIRATH MAL BIYANI) (MADHUMITA ROY) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Indore; Dated 11/10/2022 S. K. Sinha, Sr. PS आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ� / The Appellant 2. ��यथ� / The Respondent. 3. संबं�धत आयकर आयु�त / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयु�त(अपील) / The CIT(A)- 5. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, / DR, ITAT, Indore 6. गाड� फाईल / Guard file. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,

(Sr. Private Secretary) ITAT, Indore 1.Date of dictation on 27.09.2022 2.Date on which the typed draft is placed before the Dictating Member .10.2022 3.Date on which the approved draft comes to the Sr.P.S./P.S. 4.Date on which the fair order is placed before the Dictating Member for pronouncement 5.Date on which the fair order comes back to the Sr.P.S./P.S 6.Date on which the file goes to the Bench Clerk 7.Date on which the file goes to the Head Clerk…………. 8.The date on which the file goes to the Asstt. Registrar for signature on the order…………………… 9.Date of Dispatch of the Order………Date on which the typed draft is placed before the Dictating Member 19.12.2019Other Member………………Date on which the approved draft comes to

More judgments on Section 50C

All 3,223 judgments and leading authorities on Section 50C →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →