AVERY INDIA LTD.,HARYANA vs. THE PCIT, KOLKATA-1, KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal permitted the withdrawal of the appeal as the Revenue did not object. Consequently, the assessee's appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT against an order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act. At the time of hearing, the assessee's counsel sought permission to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the assessee's appeal should be permitted to be withdrawn.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH “D” KOLKATA
Before: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi
आदेश /O R D E R
PER Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Member:-
This appeal has been filed by the assessee relating to Assessment Year 2009-10 is directed against the order passed by Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Kolkata u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) vide his order dated 19.03.2015.
Shri Shashan K Kasat, Ld. Authorized Representative appeared on behalf of assessee and Shri Niraj Kumar, Ld. Departmental Representative appeared on behalf of Revenue. A.Y. 2009-10 Avery India. Ltd. Vs. CIT-1 Kol. Page 2 2. At the time of hearing Ld. Counsel for the assessee wished to seek permission for withdrawal of the appeal and Ld. DR has not objected the withdrawal of the same. As there is no objection from the Revenue, we permit the withdrawal of assessee’s appeal. Accordingly, this appeal of assessee is dismissed as withdrawal.
In the result, assessee’s appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in open court on 18/01/2017
Sd/- Sd/- (S.S.Viswanethra Ravi) (Waseem Ahmed) Judicial Member Accountant Member *Dkp, Sr.P.S �दनांकः- 18/01/2017 कोलकाता / Kolkata आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत / Copy of Order Forwarded to:- 1. अपीलाथ�/Appellant-Avery India Ltd. Plot-50-59, Sector-25, Ballabgarh, Haryana-121 004 2. ��यथ�/Respondent-CIT,Kolkata-1, P-7, Chowringhee Sq., Kol-69 3. संबं�धत आयकर आयु�त / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयु�त- अपील / CIT (A) 5. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण कोलकाता / DR, ITAT, Kolkata 6. गाड� फाइल / Guard file.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026