M/S SAFE COMMODEAL PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. CIT, KOLKATA-2, KOLKATA, KOLKATA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee's counsel, with instructions to withdraw the appeal, requested permission to do so as the assessee did not wish to press the appeal. The Revenue did not object to this request.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against a revision order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income-tax. The original assessment was framed under sections 143(3)/147 of the Income-tax Act for the assessment year 2010-11.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the assessee's appeal should be permitted to be withdrawn. The substantive merits of the revision order were not adjudicated.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH: KOLKATA
Before: Shri N. V. Vasudevan, JM & Shri M. Balaganesh, AM]
ORDER
Per Shri M. Balaganesh, AM:
This appeal by assessee is arising out of revision order of Pr. CIT, Kolkata-2, Kolkata passed u/s. 263 of the Act vide No. Pr.CIT-2/DC(Hq)-2/Kol/263/2014-15/5788- 91 dated 18/19.03.2015. Assessment was framed by ITO, Ward-5(2), Kolkata u/s. 143(3)/147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) for Assessment Year 2010-11 vide his order dated 31.08.2012.
At the time of hearing Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that he has instructions to withdraw the appeal as the assessee does not want to press the appeal and accordingly, he prayed before the bench to treat the appeal as withdrawn. Ld. Sr. DR has not raised any objection to this prayer for withdrawal. Hence, we permit the withdrawal and dismiss this appeal of assessee as withdrawn. 3. In the result, appeal of assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Order is pronounced in the open court. Sd/- Sd/- (N. V. Vasudevan) (M. Balaganesh) Judicial Member Accountant Member Dated : 25th January, 2017 Jd.(Sr.P.S.)
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Middlex, Puri vs. Commnr. Of State Tax, Banijyakar Bhawan, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026