SPECTRA REALCON LLP,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-25(1), KOLKATA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 498/KOL/2024Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata30 July 2024AY 2019-20Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg (Judicial Member), Shri Sanjay Awasthi (Accountant Member)3 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal restored the issue to the Assessing Officer. The assessee is directed to furnish a bank certificate confirming the interest payment before the due date of filing the return. The AO will consider this certificate and allow the claim if found correct.

What were the facts?

The assessee claimed interest paid on a loan to United Bank of India. The auditor inadvertently recorded this payment as principal in the audit report. The lower authorities disallowed the interest, treating it as a provision not paid before the return filing due date.

What were the issues?

Whether the interest paid on a loan was correctly disallowed by the lower authorities due to an auditor's error in the audit report, and if the assessee can provide proof of timely payment.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 43B

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH KOLKATA

Before: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

order : July 30, 2024 आदेश / ORDER संजय गग�, �या�यक सद�य �वारा / Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member: The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 15.01.2024 of the Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) AADL/JCIT(A)-1, Lucknow [hereinafter referred to as ‘CIT(A)’] passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’).

2.

The assessee in this appeal has agitated against the confirmation of addition made by the Assessing Officer u/s 43B of the Act on account of disallowance of interest paid on loan to United Bank of India.

3.

At the outset, the ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the assessee during the year had paid an amount of Rs.7017801/- to the United Bank of India, which was on account of interest. However, the auditor of the assessee in the audit report in Form 3CA has Assessment Year: 2019-20 Spectra Realcon LLP inadvertently recorded the same on account of payment towards principal amount. The ld. Counsel has further submitted that during the period from 01.09.2018 to 31.03.2019, the assessee had deposited Rs.7,43,81,102/- in the loan account out of this deposit, amount of Rs.70.17 lakh was towards interest payment and the lower authorities have disallowed the same treating the same as provision for interest, which was allegedly not paid before the due of filing of return of income.

4.

Considering the above submissions, the issue is restored to the file of the Assessing Officer with a direction that the assessee will duly furnish the necessary certificate from the bank depicting the amount paid towards the interest before due date of filing of return of income for the assessment year under consideration. If such a certificate is furnished by the assessee, the Assessing Officer will duly consider the same and allow the claim of the assessee towards interest payment, if so found correct.

5.

With the above observation, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes.

More judgments on Section 43B

All 7,161 judgments and leading authorities on Section 43B →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →