DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. UNITECH PAPER MILLS PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that as per CBDT Instruction No. 9 of 2024, appeals with a tax effect below Rs. 60,00,000/- are not maintainable unless they fall within specific exceptions, which these cases did not.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed appeals before the ITAT against orders of the CIT(Appeals) for assessment years 2010-11, 2011-12, 2014-15, and 2012-13. The tax effect of the relief granted by the CIT(Appeals) was less than Rs. 60,00,000/-.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the maintainability of the Revenue's appeals before the ITAT based on the tax effect of the relief granted by the lower appellate authority, in light of CBDT instructions.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(KZ) & Shri Rajesh Kumar
Revenue against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Kolkata-20 dated 22nd February, 2024 for assessment year 2012-13.
With the assistance of ld. representatives, we have gone through the grounds of appeals raised by the Revenue. It is pertinent to note that the tax effect by virtue of relief given by the first appellate authority is less than Rs.60,00,000/-. As per CBDT Instruction bearing No. 9 of 2024 issued on 17th September, 2024, CBDT has directed its subordinate authorities not to challenge the order of ld. CIT(Appeals) before Tribunal if tax effect by virtue of relief given by the ld. CIT(Appeals) is less than Rs.60,00,000/-. Such order could only be challenged if it comes within exceptions provided in the Instruction.
IT(SS)A No. 41/KOL/2024 (A.Y. 2010-11) IT(SS)A No. 70/KOL/2024 (A.Y. 2011-12) IT(SS)A No. 71/KOL/2024 (A.Y. 2014-15)
(A.Y. 2012-13) Unitech Paper Mills Pvt. Limited Therefore, these cases do not fall in any of the exceptions and, these appeals are not maintainable.
On due consideration of the above facts and circumstances, we dismiss these appeals of the Revenue for want of tax effect. However, in case on re-verification of the facts at the end of the Assessing Officer, it comes out that tax effect is more or this case falls in any of the exceptions provided in this Instruction. Then Revenue will be at liberty to file Miscellaneous Application for revival of these appeals. Such application should be filed within the time limit provided in the Act.
In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed. Order pronounced in the open Court on 22/10/2024. Sd/- Sd/- (Rajesh Kumar) (Rajpal Yadav) Accountant Member Vice-President (KZ) Kolkata, the 22nd day of October, 2024 Copies to :(1) Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1(2), Kolkata, Aayakar Bhawan Poorva, Room No. 310, 3rd Floor, 110, Shanti Pally, Kolkata-700107 (2) Unitech Paper Mills Pvt. Limited, 53A, Rafi Ahmed Kidwai Road, 3rd floor, Kolkata-700016
IT(SS)A No. 41/KOL/2024 (A.Y. 2010-11) IT(SS)A No. 70/KOL/2024 (A.Y. 2011-12) IT(SS)A No. 71/KOL/2024 (A.Y. 2014-15)
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026