No AI summary yet for this case.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE 2022
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD REVIEW PETITION NO.163 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
M/s. IBM INDIA PVT. LTD., No. 12, SUBRAMANYA ARCADE BANNERGHATTA ROAD BENGALURU - 560 029. ...PETITIONER (By SMT. VANI H., ADV. H)
AND 1 . THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
LTU, C.R.BUILDING
QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU.
2 . THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
CIRCLE-11(1), C.R.BUILDING
QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU. …RESPONDENTS
(NOTICE NOT ORDERED IN R/O RESPONDENTS )
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 R/W SECTION 114 OF CPC, PRAYING TO. I) TO REVIEW JUDGMENT DATED 03/11/2020 PASSED IN THE ABOVE ITA NO. 392/2011 ONLY IN SO FAR AS IT PERTAINS TO SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AT SL. NOS. 4 AND 5 AND FINDINGS IN PARAGRAPH 4, TO MEET THE ENDS OF JUSTICE. II) ANY SUCH OTHER ORDERS AS THIS HONBLE COURT MAY DEEMED FIT AND JUST.
THIS REVIEW PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J, MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Ms.Vani.H., learned counsel for the petitioner.
This review petition has been filed seeking review of the judgment dated 3.11.2020 passed in ITA No.392/2011.
After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, we find that the impugned judgment neither suffers from any infirmity nor any error
3 apparent on the face of the record, warranting interference of this Court in the review jurisdiction.
In the result, review petition fails and is hereby dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
JY/-