ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-30, NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI vs. SEVEN SEAS HOSPITALITY PRIVATE LIMITED, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that for levying penalty under Section 271DA for violation of Section 269ST, it is mandatory to record satisfaction in the assessment order. Since no such satisfaction was recorded, the penalty order was quashed.
What were the facts?
During a search, the Revenue alleged unaccounted sales by the assessee. The Assessing Officer imposed a penalty under Section 271DA for alleged violations of Section 269ST. The assessee contended that no satisfaction was recorded in the assessment order for initiating penalty proceedings.
What were the issues?
Whether penalty under Section 271DA can be levied without recording satisfaction in the assessment order regarding violation of Section 269ST.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Jai Laxmi Rice Mills110 citing379 ITR 521 · 2015 · SC
- PCIT v. Rishikesh Buildcon (P.) Ltd.27 citing147 Taxmann.com 220 · 2023 · HC · Read judgment
- Grandhi Sri Venkata Amarendra v. JCIT18 citing167 Taxmann.com 352 · 2024 · HC
- 262 ITR 260 (Delhi) and Commissioner of Income Tax-VI v. Worldwide Townships Project Ltd.13 citing367 ITR 433 · 2014 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES : A : NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN & SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA
PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM: These are appeals preferred by the Revenue against the orders dated 09.12.2024 of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-30, New Delhi (hereinafter referred as Ld. First Appellate Authority or in short Ld. ‘FAA’) in appeals No.30/10331/2017-18 and No.NFAC/2018-19/10157929 arising out of the appeals before it against the orders dated 15.06.2022 and 14.06.2022,
ITAs No.2225 & 2226/Del/2025
respectively, passed u/s 271DA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred as ‘the Act’) by the Addl.CIT, Central Range-8, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 271DA
- Sujatha Vaddanapu, Nalgonda vs ITO, Ward-1, NalgondaITA 2048/HYD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Aryanparv Realty LLP, Ahmedabad vs ITO Ward 3 3 1, AhmedabadITA 910/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- ACIT, Guwahati vs Harvinder Singh Sehgal, Thangal Bazar…ITA 379/GTY/2025[2021]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026
- Harvinder Singh Sehgal, Manipur vs Central Circle-2, GuwahatiITA 374/GTY/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Yashbiz Marketing Private Limited, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-4(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2364/AHD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026