KUNNATHUNAD SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,PERUMBAVOOR vs. THE ITO WARD 2 , ALUVA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 392/COCH/2023Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 September 2024AY 2016-17Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara (Judicial Member), Shri Amarjit Singh (Judicial Member)2 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the delay in filing the tax audit report and return was due to reasonable cause, as the assessee had to comply with state government directions. Therefore, the penalties were deleted.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeals concern penalties levied under Section 271B and 271F for delayed submission of a tax audit report and return. The assessee received its audit report late from the state government and filed its return along with it.

What were the issues?

Whether the delay in filing the tax audit report and return constituted a reasonable cause for deleting the penalties under Section 273B.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 271B,Section 271F,Section 273B

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN

Before: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Respondent: Smt. V. Swarnalatha, Sr. D.R
Hearing: 12.08.2024Pronounced: 25.09.2024

Appellant by: ------- None ------- Respondent by: Smt. V. Swarnalatha, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing: 12.08.2024 Date of Pronouncement: 25.09.2024 O R D E R Per Bench These assessee’s twin appeals arise against the orders of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [CIT(A)] in proceedings u/s.271B and 271F of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) as below: - DIN & Order No. Date No. 1 391/Coch/2023 2016-17 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 23.03.2023 23/1051193494(1) 2 392/Coch/2023 2016-17 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 23.03.2023 23/1051193560(1)

Cases called twice. None appears at assessee’s behest. It is accordingly proceeded ex-parte.

2.

We advert to the assessee’s former appeal seeks to reverse both the learned lower authorities action levying section 271B penalty on account of delay in submission of tax audit report before the learned Assessing (AY : 2016-17) Kunnathunad Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. Officer. There is hardly any dispute between the parties that it is not a case of altogether non-submission of the tax audit report, once it has come on record that the assessee, inter alia, received its audit report [qualified by the state government] only by 31st October, 2017 followed by it’s return filed on 31.03.2018 along with the same. The assessee’s impugned delay in filing the tax audit report therefore, does not involve any considerable time once stood submitted very well during the course of assessment itself. We thus treat both these appeals as a fit case to delete the impugned sec.271F and sec.271B penalty(ies) for belated filing of return and tax- audit report, respectively, as involving a reasonable cause(s) within the meaning of sec.273B of the Act since the assessee has to be comply the state government’s directions only. Both of these instant appeals succeed in very terms.

3.

To sum up, these assessee’s twin appeals ITA.Nos.391 & 392/Coch/2023 are allowed in above terms. A copy of this common order be placed in the respective case files. Order pronounced in the open court on 25th September, 2024.

More judgments on Section 271B

All 1,993 judgments and leading authorities on Section 271B →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →