MARSONS LTD.,KOLKATA vs. PCIT, , KOLKATA
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that once the NCLT passes a final order under the IBC, all claims, including taxes, are extinguished. Therefore, the PCIT cannot revise an assessment order as it would be an invalid exercise of jurisdiction.
What were the facts?
The assessee company underwent proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016, with the NCLT passing a final order approving a resolution plan. Subsequently, the PCIT passed a revisionary order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act.
What were the issues?
Whether the PCIT can exercise revisionary powers under Section 263 after a final order has been passed by the NCLT under the IBC, extinguishing all debts and claims.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH: KOLKATA
Before: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Shri Rajesh Kumar]
(PAN: AABCM 9906 H) ( अपीलाथ� ) Respondent / (��यथ�) Appellant / Date of Hearing / सुनवाई 23.10.2024 क� �त�थ Date of Pronouncement/ 20.11.2024 आदेश उ�घोषणा क� �त�थ For the Appellant/ Shri C. M . Roy, A.R �नधा�रती क� ओर से For the Respondent/ Shri Pradip Kumar Biswas, Addl. CIT राज�व क� ओर से ORDER / आदेश Per Rajesh Kumar, AM: This is the appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-NFAC, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Ld. CIT(A)”] dated 15.03.2024 for AY 2018-19.
The assessee has challenged the revisionary order passed u/s 263 of the Act by the PCIT despite the fact that NCLT has already passed final order on 25.1.2022 under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Assessment Year: 2018-19 Marsons Ltd.
Facts in brief are that the assessee company has gone into proceedings under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as IBC, 2016) before NCLT and NCLT has passed an order vide order dated 25.01.2022 approving the Revised Resolution Plan for registration. The NCLT has also passed the final order on 25.01.2022 approving the registration resolution professional plan. Once the NCLT has passed the order under IBC 2016, then all the claims, debt to Govt. authorities including the taxes stood extinguished.
The assessee has challenged the invalid exercise of jurisdiction by the PCIT even when the order was finally passed by NCLT dated 25.01.2022 on the ground that all the outstanding demands to the deptt stands extinguished meaning thereby that the PCIT cannot revise any assessment framed by the AO as erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue as with the passing of final order by NCLT all the claims by way of taxes and funds to the Department would be extinguished. The case of the assessee finds support from the decision of Co-ordinate Bench of Kolkata in the case of M/s Kohinoor Steel Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO in for AY 2012-13 dated 19.02.2024 wherein the Co-ordinate Bench has held that as per Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 no proceedings can continue against the corporate debtor i.e. the assessee after the order of the NCLT. The Co-ordinate Bench held that in view of this all the appeals before the Tribunal filed by the assessee are dismissed as infructuous.
Considering the above facts and circumstances, we are inclined to set aside the order of PCIT u/s 263 of the Act as invalid by allowing the appeal of the assessee.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed.
Order is pronounced in the open court on 20th November, 2024
Sd/- Sd/- (Rajpal Yadav /राजपाल यादव) (Rajesh Kumar/राजेश कुमार) Vice-President/उपा�य� Accountant Member/लेखा सद�य Dated: 20th November, 2024 SM, Sr. PS Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. Appellant- Marsons Ltd., Marsons House, Chakmir, Budge Budge, Trunk Road,Maheshtala-700142 2. Respondent – PCIT, Kolkata 3. Ld. CIT(A)-NFAC, Delhi 4. Ld. PCIT- , Kolkata 5. DR, Kolkata Benches, Kolkata (sent through e-mail)
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026