THE VELLIAMATTOM SERVICE CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD,PANNIMATTOM, THODUPUZHA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, THODUPUZHA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 596/COCH/2024Status: DisposedITAT Cochin18 November 2024AY 2017-18Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao (Accountant Member)3 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer cannot go behind the registration certificate granted by the relevant authority to classify the assessee differently. Therefore, the assessee's claim for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) should be considered.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a primary agricultural credit co-operative society, claimed deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i). The Assessing Officer denied this exemption, classifying the assessee as a service co-operative bank. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee, registered as a primary agricultural credit co-operative society, is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) despite being classified as a service co-operative bank by the AO.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80P(2)(a)(i),Section 143(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN

Before: Shri Inturi Rama Rao

For Appellant: Shri Mathew Joseph, CA
For Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Hearing: 30.10.2024Pronounced: 18.11.2024

O R D E R This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-5, Kolkata [CIT(A)] dated 31.05.2024 for Assessment Year (AY) 2017-18.

2.

The assessee is a primary agricultural credit co-operative society registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act. The return of income for AY 2017-18 was filed on 18.01.2018. Against the said return of income assessment was completed by the Assessing Officer (AO) vide order dated 19.12.2019 passed u/s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) at a total income of Rs. 23,21,729/- denying exemption u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act by holding that the assessee is not a primary agricultural co-operative society, but a service co-operative bank.

4.

Being aggrieved, by the order of the CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before he Tribunal.

5.

I have heard the rival contentions of both the parties, also perused the material available on record. The assessee is a primary agricultural society formed with the object of providing credit facilities to its members. The assessee claimed deduction of income us 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. The AO classified the assessee as a co-operative bank and therefore denied the deduction. The AO under the provisions of the Income Tax Act cannot go behind any registration certificate granted by the Registrar of Cooperative Societies, engages in a fact-finding enquiry as to whether it is a primary agricultural co-operative society as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. CIT [2021] 431 ITR 1 (SC) wherein it was held as under: - “32. Fifthly, as has been held in Udaipur Sahkari Upbhokta Thok Bhandar Ltd. v. CIT MANU/SC/1209/2009: (2009) 8 SCC 393 at paragraph 23, the burden is on the Assessee to show, by adducing facts, that it is entitled to claim the deduction Under Section 80P. Therefore, the assessing officer under the IT Act cannot be said to be going behind any registration certificate when he engages in a fact-finding enquiry as to whether the co-operative society concerned is in fact providing credit facilities to its members. Such fact finding enquiry (see Section 133(6) of the IT Act) would entail examining all relevant facts of the co-operative society in question to find out whether it is, as a matter of fact, providing credit facilities to its members, whatever be its nomenclature. Once this task is fulfilled by the Assessee, by placing reliance on such facts as would show that it is engaged in providing credit facilities to its members, the assessing officer must then scrutinize the same, and arrive at a conclusion as to whether this is, in fact, so.”

6.

Therefore in the absence of any banking licence granted to the assessee society, AO cannot consider the assessee as co-operative bank and deny the exemption. Further the addition, if any, made to the returned income also qualifies as Velliamattom Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. business income eligible for deduction u/s. 80P of the Act. Therefore, the AO is directed to allow the deduction u/s. 80P(2)(i)(a) of the Act.

7.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

More judgments on Section 80P(2)(a)(i)

All 2,347 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80P(2)(a)(i) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →