CRESCENT SERVICE SOCIETY,ALAPPUZHA vs. DY.DIRECTOR OF INCOMETAX CPC , BENGALURU
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that filing Form No. 10 is a mandatory compliance for claiming benefits under Sections 11 and 13. Any failure to comply with statutory requirements, even for exemptions, would go in favor of the Revenue.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a registered charitable society, claimed benefits under Sections 11 and 13 of the Income-tax Act. However, these benefits were denied by the AO/CPC because Form No. 10 was not filed with the return of income.
What were the issues?
Whether the filing of Form No. 10 along with the return of income is a mandatory condition for claiming exemption under Sections 11 and 13 of the Income-tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN
Before: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav
Asst.Year 2022-2023 M/s.Crescent Service Society The Income Tax Officer Crescent Building, C.C.S.B. Road Ward 1 v. Alappuzha. Near K.V.Bridge Alappuzha – 688 012. PAN : AAATC9547Q. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by :Sri.Shafeeq A.M., CA Respondent by :Smt.Leena Lal, Senior AR Date of Pronouncement : 09.12.2024 Date of Hearing : 20.11.2024 O R D E R
Per Prakash Chand Yadav, JM :
The present appeal of the assessee is arising from the order of the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) dated 19th February, 2024 and relates to the assessment year 2022-2023.
The short facts relating to the present appeal are that the assessee is a registered charitable society registered u/s.12A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, filed its return of income for the impugned assessment year claiming benefit of secs. 11 and 13 of the Act. However, while processing the return of income, the CPC/AO denied the benefit of secs.11 and 13 to the assessee on the ground that the assessee failed to file Form No.10 with the return of income.
Aggrieved with the order of the CPC/AO, the assessee preferred an appeal before the learned CIT(A) and contended that the filing of Form No.10 along with the return of income is only directory provision and hence deduction u/ss.12 and 13 may kindly be granted to the assessee. The learned CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee.
Aggrieved with the order of the CIT(A), the assessee has come up in appeal before us and has raised four grounds of appeal. The learned AR appearing on behalf of the assessee has contended that Form No.10 was not been able to file along with the return of income because of some technical clichés in the Income-tax portal, and hence, the assessee may kindly be granted the benefit of secs. 11 and 13 of the Act.
The learned Departmental Representative relied upon the orders of the authorities below.
After considering the rival submissions and perusing the material available on record, we observe that in this case the assessee has not been able to file Form No.10. Earlier therewere decisions, wherein it has been held that filing of form-10 is a directory provision.However, recently the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Dilip Kumar and Others reported in (2018) SCR 1191(SC)has held there is distinction in interpreting a charging provision of a taxation statute and in the interpretation of exemption Notification – Any ambiguity in charging provision inures to the benefit of the assessee, but . Crescent Service Society. any ambiguity in the exemption clause or exemption Notification would go in favour of Revenue. Therefore we are of the view that the benefits provided under the Income-tax Act cannot be granted if any statutory compliance could not be made in accordance with law. The assessee is at liberty to file a petition for condonation of delay in filing the Form No.10 before the CIT who has been given powers to condone the delay in filing of Form 10.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced on this 09th day of December, 2024.
More judgments on Section 11
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 531/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 530/NAG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- J.M.Swamy vs. Government Of INDIAKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Acc LTD. vs. Secy.Industries Deptt.Orissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Kumaran Transports (Tuticorin) Private Limited vs. The Assistant Commissioner Madras · 16 Oct 2026