SUNILKUMAR JAYABHAVAN DIVAKARAN,KOLLAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

PDF · subscribers
ITA 525/COCH/2023Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 December 2024AY 2016-17Bench: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO (Accountant Member), SHRI PRAKASH CHAND YADAV (Judicial Member)2 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for AY 2016-17. At the outset, the assessee's counsel informed the tribunal that the appeal was a duplicate and intended to withdraw it.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the assessee's intention to withdraw a duplicate appeal.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH

Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, AM & SHRI PRAKASH CHAND YADAV, JM

For Appellant: Shri Balasubramania Iyer, Advocate
For Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Hearing: 11.12.2024Pronounced: 30.12.2024

O R D E R Per: Inturi Rama Rao, AM This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 28.06.2023 for Assessment Year (AY) 2016-17.

2.

At the outset the learned counsel for the assessee informed that assessee intend, to withdraw the present appeal, as it is a duplicate appeal. The original appeal, contesting same issues, was disposed of by this Tribunal earlier.

4.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →