Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCHES “B”, MUMBAI
Before: Shri Joginder Singh, & Shri Ramit Kochar
आदेश / O R D E R Per Joginder Singh (Judicial Member) The Revenue is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 12/12/2013 of the Ld. First Appellate Authority, Mumbai.
2 M/s. Brijmohan Purushottamdas & 1940/Mum/2014
At the outset it was brought to our notice that the tax effect involved in the present appeals is below prescribed monetary limit of Rs.10 lakh for filing the appeal before this Tribunal. The ld. DR, Shri Neil Philiph, did not controvert the factual matrix.
2.1. We have considered the submission of ld. DR and perused the material available on record. In view of the above, it is noted that the tax effect in the present appeals is below prescribed limit of Rs.10 lakh for filing the appeal before the Tribunal, as contained in CBDT instruction No.21 of 2015, dated 10/12/2015 (F No.279/Misc./142/2007-IT(PT), applicable with retrospective effect, wherein, the Department was advised/directed by the Board not to file appeal in the cases where the tax effect does not exceed the following monetary limit.:-
Sl. Appeals in Income –tax matters Monetary Limit (in Rs.) No. 1. Before ITAT 10,00,000/- 2. U/s 260 A before Hon’ble High 20,00,000/- Court 3. Before Hon’ble Supreme Court 25,00,000/- In view of the above instruction, since, the tax effect is less than Rs.10,00,000/-, consequently, the appeals of the Revenue are not maintainable, therefore, dismissed.
3 M/s. Brijmohan Purushottamdas & 1940/Mum/2014 Finally, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed as not maintainable. This Order was pronounced in the open court in the presence of ld. DR at the conclusion of the hearing on 03/11/2016.