ASST CIT 19(1), MUMBAI vs. ADITYA D MAHADEVIA, MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1351/MUM/2015Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 November 2016AY 2011-126 pages

In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that Section 50C is not applicable to the transfer of leasehold rights, as it applies only to capital assets being land or building or both. The Tribunal also upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to allow set-off of business loss against 'income from other sources' to provide maximum benefit to the assessee.

What were the facts?

The assessee assigned leasehold rights in a property for Rs. 28,59,395/-. The AO invoked Section 50C and made an addition of Rs. 41,47,204/-. The CIT(A) deleted this addition. The revenue also disputed the set-off of business loss against 'income from other sources' instead of long-term capital gains.

What were the issues?

Whether Section 50C is applicable to the transfer of leasehold rights in property. Whether the assessee is entitled to set off business loss against 'income from other sources' for maximum tax benefit.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 50C,Section 71(2)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(5)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A”, BENCH MUMBAI

Before: SHRI R.C.SHARMA, AM & SHRI RAVISH SOOD, JM

Hearing: 24/10/2016Pronounced: 04/11/2016

आदेश की प्रनिलऱपप अग्रेपषि/Copy of the Order forwarded to : अऩीराथी / The Appellant 1. प्रत्मथी / The Respondent. 2. आमकय आमुक्त(अऩीर) / The CIT(A), Mumbai. 3. आमकय आमुक्त / CIT 4. ववबागीम प्रनतननधध, आमकय अऩीरीम अधधकयण, भुंफई / DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5.

More judgments on Section 50C

All 3,223 judgments and leading authorities on Section 50C →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →