ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. SH. O.P. ARORA, NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the tax effect was below the threshold specified in CBDT Circular No. 03/2018. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed on this ground.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against an order of the CIT(A) for AY 2009-10. The tax effect of the appeal was found to be below Rs. 20,00,000/-.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the Revenue's appeal should be dismissed due to low tax effect as per CBDT circulars.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘E’ NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI G.D. AGRAWAL, HON’BLE & SHRI K.N. CHARY
ORDER PER K. NARSIMHA CHARY, J.M.
This appeal by the Revenue is preferred against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax [Appeals]-III, Delhi, dated 10.01.2012 for Assessment Year 2009-10.
It was seen that tax effect of the appeal filed by the revenue is below Rs.20,00,000/-Therefore, the ld. DR was asked as to why the appeals filed by the revenue should not be dismissed due to low tax effect in the light of the recent CBDT Circular No.03/2018 dated 11th July,2018.
The Ld. CIT (DR) fairly admitted that the tax effect involved in the impugned appeal is less than Rs.20 lakhs and therefore, the appeal filed by the Revenue have to be dismissed. He, however, requested that if at any point of time it is noticed that the case of the Revenue falls under any of the amended para 10 of the Circular vide Notification
20.08.2018, the Revenue should be allowed to file Miscellaneous Application for revival of the appeal.
After hearing the Ld. DR and on perusal of the material available on record we find the tax effect involved in the grounds raised by the Revenue in each of the impugned appeal is admittedly below Rs.20 lakhs. Therefore, the appeal filed by the Revenue is not maintainable in view of the CBDT Circular No.03/2018 dated 11th July, 2018 which is applicable even to pending appeals. However, if the Revenue at any point of time finds that the case of the Revenue falls under any of the clauses as per amended para 10 of the said Circular vide Notification dated 20.08.2018, the Revenue is at liberty to file Miscellaneous Application for revival of the appeal. The appeals filed by the revenue are accordingly dismissed.
In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed in the terms indicated above. Order pronounced in the open Court on 18.09.2018
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026