SACHIN COTSPIN LTD,MUMBAI vs. CIT (A)-9, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the adverse material was not clearly confronted to the assessee, and additions were made based on third-party information without independent corroboration. The matter was restored to the AO for proper confrontation and opportunity to the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee's case was reopened based on information that the assessee was a beneficiary of bogus share transactions. The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions as unexplained investments, which were upheld by the CIT(A). The assessee did not appear for hearings.
What were the issues?
Whether additions made based on seized material from third parties, without proper confrontation to the assessee, are valid. Whether the assessee was provided with adequate opportunity to disprove the transactions.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “H” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JM & SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
आदेश की प्रनिलऱपप अग्रेपषि/Copy of the Order forwarded to : अऩीराथी / The Appellant 1. प्रत्मथी / The Respondent 2. आमकय आमुति(अऩीर) / The CIT(A) 3. आमकय आमुति / CIT – concerned 4. ववबागीम प्रयियनधध, आमकय अऩीरीम अधधकयण, भुंफई / DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. गार्ड पाईर / Guard File 6. आदेशाि सार/ BY ORDER,
उप/सहायक पुंजीकार (Dy./Asst. Registrar) आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, भुंफई / ITAT, Mumbai
Sr. No. Details Date Initials Designation 1 Draft dictation sheets are attached 16.11.16 Sr.PS/PS 2 Draft dictated on 16.11.16 Sr.PS/PS 3 Draft Placed before author Sr.PS/PS 4 Draft proposed & placed before the JM/AM Second Member 5 Draft discussed/approved by Second JM/AM Member 6 Approved Draft comes to the 22.11.16 Sr.PS/PS Sr.PS/PS 7 Order pronouncement on 23.11.16 Sr.PS/PS 8 File sent to the Bench Clerk 23.11.16 Sr.PS/PS 9 Date on which the file goes to the Head clerk 10 Date on which file goes to the AR 11 Date of Dispatch of order
More judgments on Section 132
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Naresh Chandra Khattar, Agra vs ITO Ward-1(1)(2), AgraITA 475/AGR/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026