MS. SANDHYA SRINIVASAN,CHENNAI vs. CIT(A), DELHI, DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 98/CHNY/2024Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 April 2024AY 2017-18Bench: HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM AND HON’BLE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI (Judicial Member)2 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

While acknowledging the assessee's non-appearance, the Tribunal restored the appeal to the CIT(A) for de novo adjudication to uphold the principle of natural justice, granting one final opportunity.

What were the facts?

The assessee is in appeal against additions made under sections 69 & 69A for AY 2017-18. The assessee failed to appear before the Assessing Officer and the first appellate authority.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee should be granted another opportunity to present their case despite repeated non-appearance before lower authorities.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 69,Section 69A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI

Before: HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM & HON’BLE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JM

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘सी’ �ायपीठ चे�ई म�। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय +ी मनोज कुमार अ/वाल ,लेखा सद3 एवं माननीय +ी मनु कुमार िगरी, �ाियक सद3 के सम7। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM AND HON’BLE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JM आयकरअपील सं./ (िनधा8रणवष8 / Assessment Year: 2017-18) Ms. Sandhya Srinivasan ITO बनाम/ Vs. Old No.24,18, Shivaji Street CHE-W-(115)(91) T.Nagar, Chennai – 600017 Chennai. �थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. DBHPS-9632-B (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) : (� थ� / Respondent) अपीलाथ� कीओरसे/ Appellant by : None � थ�कीओरसे/Respondent by : Shri P. Sajit Kumar (JCIT)-Ld. Sr. DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 16-04-2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 16-04-2024 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member)

1.

Aggrieved by confirmation of certain addition for Assessment Year (AY) 2017-18, the assessee is in further appeal before us. At the time of hearing, none appeared for assessee. The Ld. Sr. DR pleaded for dismissal of the appeal on the ground that the assessee failed to appear even before learned first appellate authority.

2.

From case records, it emerges that Ld. Assessing Officer made addition u/s 69 & 69A. The assessee did not appear during assessment proceedings. Upon further appeal, the position remained the same and the assessee did not appear before first appellate authority also. Accordingly, the assessment was confirmed against which the assessee is in further appeal before us. 3. Though we concur with the submissions of Ld. Sr. DR, however, keeping in mind the principle of natural justice, we deem it fit to grant another opportunity of hearing to the assessee. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the appeal is restored back to the file of Ld. CIT(A) for de novo adjudication after affording opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The assessee is directed to substantiate its case forthwith without any fail failing which Ld. CIT(A) shall be at liberty to proceed with the disposal of the appeal on merits. 4. The appeal stand allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on 16th April, 2024.

(MANU KUMAR GIRI) (MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL) �ाियक सद3 / JUDICIAL MEMBER लेखा सद3 / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER चे3ई Chennai; िदनांक Dated : 16-04-2024 DS आदेशकीSितिलिपअ/ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ�/Appellant 2. � थ�/Respondent 3. आयकरआयु</CIT 4. िवभागीय�ितिनिध/DR 5. गाडAफाईल/GF

More judgments on Section 69

All 9,011 judgments and leading authorities on Section 69 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →