SEMBA GOUNDER SUBRAMANIAM SHANMUGAM,SALEM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(3), SALEM
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal, considering the principle of natural justice, granted the assessee another opportunity to substantiate its case before the CIT(A). The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was restored for de novo adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal for AY 2017-18 was dismissed by the CIT(A) for non-prosecution as the assessee failed to make any representation despite opportunities. The assessment was framed on a best judgment basis.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee should be granted another opportunity to present their case before the lower appellate authority despite previous non-prosecution.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM & HON’BLE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JM
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘सी’ �ायपीठ चे�ई म�। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय +ी मनोज कुमार अ/वाल ,लेखा सद3 एवं माननीय +ी मनु कुमार िग7र, �ाियक सद3 के सम8। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM AND HON’BLE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JM आयकरअपील सं./ (िनधा9रणवष9 / Assessment Year: 2017-18) Shri Semba Gounder Subramaniam ITO Shanmugam Ward-1(3) बनाम/ Vs. Prop. M.S. Prithiv Marketing, Salem. 6 158-A Vinayagar Nagar, Kasakaranur, Salem-636 005. �थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. ATVPS-1011-K (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) : (� थ� / Respondent) अपीलाथ� कीओरसे/ Appellant by : Mr. Sri Krishna (CA)-Ld.AR (Virtual Hearing) � थ�कीओरसे/Respondent by : Shri P. Sajit Kumar (JCIT)-Ld. Sr. DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 17-04-2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 17-04-2024 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member)
Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2017-18 arises out of the order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 20-10-2023 in the matter of assessment framed by Ld. Assessing Officer [AO] u/s. 144 of the Act on 13-12-2019.
The registry has noted a delay of 31 days in the appeal, the condonation of which has been sought by Ld. AR. Considering the period of delay, the delay is condoned and we proceed with disposal of the appeal. 3. The only grievance of the assessee is confirmation of addition u/s 69A for Rs.14.72 Lacs. The assessment has been framed on best judgment basis. Upon perusal of para-5 of first appellate order, it is clear that the assessee failed to make any representation therein despite being provided with various opportunities. Accordingly, the appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution. Aggrieved, the assessee is in further appeal before us. The Ld. AR has pleaded for another opportunity of hearing before lower authorities which has been opposed by Ld. Sr. DR. 4. Though the assessee has remained negligent, however, keeping in mind the principle of natural justice, we deem it fit to grant another opportunity to the assessee to substantiate its case. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the appeal is restored back to the file of Ld. CIT(A) for de novo adjudication with a direction to the assessee to substantiate its case. The same would come at a cost of Rs.2,000/- which shall be deposited by the assessee within 30 days from the date of receipt of this order to ‘Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority’ at Hon’ble High Court of Madras. The proof of the same shall be furnished by the assessee to learned CIT(A) who shall proceed for de novo adjudication after affording opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The assessee is directed to substantiate its case forthwith failing which Ld. CIT(A) shall be at liberty to proceed with the disposal of the appeal on merits.
The appeal stand allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in open court on 17th April, 2024.
More judgments on Section 69A
- Vishal Kumar Patel(HUF), Raipur vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), RaipurITA 595/RPR/2026[2017-18]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026