GENUINE ELECTRIC COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED,HARIDWAR vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE - 1(3)(1), HARDWAR, HARDWAR UTTARAKHAND
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT found that the CIT(A) proceeded ex-parte and lacked detailed adjudication. In the interest of justice, the appeal was restored to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was heard ex-parte by the CIT(A)/NFAC, who affirmed the Assessing Officer's additions without detailed adjudication. The assessee did not appear before the ITAT.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) properly adjudicated the appeal when proceeding ex-parte and whether the ITAT should restore the appeal for fresh adjudication.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DEHRADUN BENCH, DEHRADUN
Before: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. M. Balaganesh
Asstt. Year : 2017-18 Genuine Electric Company Pvt. Ltd., Vs ACIT, Plot No. 47, Sector-8A, SIDCUL IIE, Circle-1(3)(1), SIDCUL, Haridwar, U.K.-249403 Haridwar, U.K.-224110 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AABCG1132H Assessee by: None Revenue by: Sh. A. S. Rana, Sr. DR Date of Hearing: 17.03.2025 Date of Pronouncement: 28.03.2025 ORDER Per Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member:
This assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2017-18, arises against the order of CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi’s DIN & orderNo. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023-24/1058317794(1) dated 29.11.2023, in proceedings u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”).
Case called twice. None appears at the assessee’s behest. It is accordingly proceeded ex-parte.
It emerges at the outset during the course of hearing that the learned CIT(A)/NFAC’s detailed discussion has proceeded ex-parte against the assessee thereby affirming the Assessing Officer’s action making the corresponding disallowances/additions herein. Nor do we find any substantive Genuine Electric Company Pvt. Ltd. lower appellate adjudication as contemplated u/s 250(6) of the Act requiring the CIT(A)/NFAC to first frame points of determination followed by a detailed discussion thereupon.
Mr. A. S. Rana vehemently argues during the course of hearing in support of CIT(A)’s finding that the assessee had not filed any explanation or evidence supporting it’s case and therefore, his instant appeal deserves to be dismissed.
We have given our thoughtful consideration to the foregoing rival stand and are of the considered view that since the CIT(A) has proceeded ex-parte against the assessee, possibility of some communication gaps between the taxpayer and the arguing counsel involving the newly introduced system of faceless hearings, could not be altogether ruled out.
Faced with this situation, in the larger interest of justice, we deem it appropriate to restore the assessee’s instant appeal back to the CIT(A)/NFAC for it’s afresh appropriate adjudication, within three effective opportunities subject to a rider that the taxpayer shall plead and prove the case at his own risk and responsibility, in consequential proceedings. Ordered accordingly.
Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 28/03/2025.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026