Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Before: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Jagadish
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ’डी’ �ायपीठ, चे�ई IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘D’ BENCH, CHENNAI �ी एसएस िव�ने� रिव, �ाियक सद� एवं �ी जगदीश, लेखा सद� के सम� । Before Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Judicial Member & Shri Jagadish, Accountant Member आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.1169/Chny/2024
Charminar Baitulmal Society, Vs. The Commissioner of No. 20/8, Natcharammal Street, Income Tax (Exemption), Perambur Barracks Road, Pulianthope, Chennai 600 034. Chennai 600 012. [PAN: AACTC0054A] (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) (��थ�/Respondent) अपीलाथ� की ओर से / Appellant by : None ��थ� की ओर से/Respondent by : Shri A. Sasikumar, CIT सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date of hearing : 24.06.2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 26.06.2024 आदेश /O R D E R PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 22.09.2023 passed by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Chennai in rejecting Form No. 10AB seeking registration under section 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” in short].
We find that this appeal was filed with a delay of 154 days. The assessee filed an affidavit stating reasons for the said delay and prayed for condonation of that delay. We find that none appeared on behalf of the
2 I.T.A. No.1169/Chny/24
assessee. However, on perusal of the affidavit and upon hearing the ld. DR, we find that the reasons explained by the assessee are bonafide and therefore, the delay is condoned.
The Ld. CIT(E) rejected the application for registration on the ground that the application was filed beyond the prescribed due date and that the Commissioner of Income Tax has no power to condone the delay in filing the application in Form 10AB.
We have heard the arguments of both the sides and perused the relevant material available on record. It is noted that subsequent to the order of Ld. CIT(E), the Central Board of Direct Taxes has issued a Circular No.07/24 dated 25.04.2024 and has extended date for filing such applications up to 30.06.2024 for all such cases including the assessee. The relevant para of the circular is reproduced as under: “4.1 Further, in cases where any trust, institution or fund has already made an application in Form No. 10AB, and where the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner has passed an order rejecting such application, on or before the issuance of this Circular, solely on account of the fact that the application was furnished after the due date or that the application has been furnished under the wrong section code, it may furnish a fresh application in Form No. 10AB within the extended time provided in paragraph 3(ii) i.e. 30.06.2024.”
3 I.T.A. No.1169/Chny/24
Considering the subsequent development and in the interests of justice, we are of the view that the assessee should be given an opportunity to approach the Ld. CIT(E) for re-consideration of its application for registration under section 12AB of the Act in light of the CBDT Circular, supra. The ld. CIT(E) shall consider the fresh application filed in terms of the said circular and pass order by taking into account the provisional approval already granted. In view of the above, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as infructuous.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as infructuous. Order pronounced on 26th June, 2024 at Chennai.
Sd/- Sd/- (JAGADISH) (S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Chennai, Dated, 26.06.2024 Vm/- आदेश की �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत/Copy to: 1. अपीलाथ�/Appellant, 2.��थ�/ Respondent, 3. आयकर आयु�/CIT, Chennai/Madurai/Coimbatore/Salem 4. िवभागीय �ितिनिध/DR & 5. गाड� फाईल/GF.