SH. IRSHAD ILAHI,DEHRADUN vs. ITO, W- 1(3), DEHRADUN
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) in the interest of justice. Considering the new submissions and the need for factual verification, the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee's assessment was reopened, and a significant capital gain was added due to non-compliance. The assessee's appeal to the CIT(A) was dismissed for delay and lack of supporting evidence. The assessee then appealed to the ITAT, providing additional grounds and explanations for the delay.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) should be condoned and whether the matter should be restored to the AO for fresh adjudication based on new evidence.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 144,Section 143(3),Section 250,Section 249
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DEHRADUN BENCH, ‘DB’: DEHRADUN
Before: SHRI VIMAL KUMAR & SHRI BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH
PER BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH, AM,
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of National
Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi/ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), dated 03.04.2024 pertaining to Assessment Year 2014-15 arising out of assessment
order u/s 144/143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961(hereinafter referred as ‘the Act’), dated 22.12.2017. 2. Brief facts of the case:- The assessment in this case was reopened u/s 147
of the Act vide notice dated 18.10.2016. In response to the said notice, the assessee filed a return of income on 13.07.2017 declaring total income of Rs.2,99,580/-. The AO has given a list of dates in para no.2 on page-2 of the assessment order, where
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026