MODERN ENGLISH SCHOOL EDUCATION SOCIETY,KORAPUT vs. CIT(EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(Exemption) was not justified in rejecting the application. The assessee's AR presented arguments and MOA/AOA clauses to counter the CIT's objections regarding amendments and winding up.
What were the facts?
The assessee society applied for registration under Section 12AA and approval under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act. The CIT (Exemption) rejected the application citing deficiencies in the MOA and AOA regarding amendment, winding up, and investment clauses, and clarity on revocability.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(Exemption) was justified in refusing registration and approval based on perceived deficiencies in the society's MOA and AOA.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK
Before: S/SHRI N.S SAINI & PAVAN KUMAR GADALE
Per N.S.Saini, AM This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(Exemptions), Hyderabad, dated 28.9.2015. 2. The sole issue involved in this appeal is that the CIT(Exemptions),
Hyderabad was not justified in refusing to grant registration u/s.12AA of the Act and approval u/s. 80G of the Act to the assessee society.
Brief facts of the case are that the assessee society filed application
in Form No.10A and Form No.10G on 30.3.2015 seeking registration
u/s.12AA of the Act and approval under section 80G(5) of the Act. The CIT(Exemption), Hyderabad rejected the application of the assessee on the following grounds:
1) As seen from the MOA, the ‘amendment clause’ does not specifically stipulate that the amendments
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026