The Commissioner of Income Tax-III vs. M/S Suryalakshmi Cotton Mills Limited,

Similar judgments

Other orders that rely on the same authority or decide the same section.

• Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 vs M/S Jay Auto Components Ltd
  Delhi26 Sept 2022Allowed

  Also relies on Jagdish Gulati v. UOI; LAC No. 224/11. Learned Senior Counsel and 3 other authorities

  The High Court determined that the market value of the acquired land should be Rs. 2,07,500 per Bigha. This enhanced compensation was to be applied uniformly to all similarly acquired land in the four villages mentioned,...

• Pr. Commissioner Ofincome Tax -6 vs Nazar Trading Pvt.Ltd
  Delhi14 Oct 2015Allowed

  Also relies on Jagdish Gulati v. UOI; LAC No. 224/11. Learned Senior Counsel and 3 other authorities

  The High Court determined that the land acquired in village Kilokari should be compensated at Rs. 2,07,500/- per Bigha. This rate was also extended to similarly acquired land in villages Khizrabad, Nangli Razapur, and Ga...

• Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-O9 vs M/S Tinna Finex Ltd
  Delhi15 Feb 2016Dismissed

  Also relies on Pushpa Devi Bhagat Vs. Rajinder Singh (2006) 5 SCC 566, Horil v. Keshav

  The tribunal held that a civil suit is not maintainable to challenge a compromise deed that has become part of judicial proceedings. The challenge to such a compromise must be made before the court that recorded it.

• Barunei Roller Flour Mill (P) Ltd vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) 1
  Orissa3 Nov 2023Partly Allowed

  Also relies on Sunder v. UOI19. 19

  The High Court upheld the uniform rate awarded by the Reference Court but modified the award regarding interest, solatium, and deductions. The case was deemed fit for remand due to lack of evidence but was ultimately dis...

• The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax(Cental)… vs Shri D Rama Rao, Vijayawada
  Andhra Pradesh15 Apr 2025Dismissed

  Also relies on Narendra & Ors. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.10 8

  The High Court dismissed the appeals filed by the insurance company. However, it modified and enhanced the compensation awarded by the Tribunal in both cases.