Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Detected automatically from the text. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2015
PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B MANOHAR
ITA No.115/2015
BETWEEN:
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
C R BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD
BANGALORE
THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD – 11 (1) RASHTROTHANA BHAVAN NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BANGALORE – 560 001.
.. APPELLANTS
(BY SRI: K V ARAVIND, ADV)
AND:
M/S EXILANT TECHNOLOGIES PVT.LTD. NO.46, SUBBARAMA CHETTY ROAD BASAVANAGUDI, BANGALORE – 560 004 PAN NO.AABCE3070A.
.. RESPONDENT
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A OF INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 26.09.2014 PASSED IN ITA NO.1768/BANG/2013 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-2011 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE AND TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ITAT, BANGALORE IN ITA NO.1768/BANG/2013 DATED 26.09.2014 CONFIRMING THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD – 11 (1), BANGALORE.
THIS ITA COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, VINEET SARAN,, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
The question involved in this appeal is covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Tata Elxi Limited (2012) 349 ITR 98. In the light of the aforesaid judgment, this appeal stands dismissed.
However, it is submitted by learned Counsel for the appellants that against the judgment of this Court, an appeal is filed to the Apex Court and is pending consideration.
In the event of the Apex Court reversing the judgment of this Court, the assessing authority shall pass consequential orders in
terms of Section 260(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in conformity with the outcome of the appeal before the Supreme Court.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
bkm