INCOME TAX OFFICER, BIBIKULAM MADURAI vs. D N PUBLIC CHARITABLE TRUST, ARASARADI MADURAI TAMIL NADU
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal decided that the CIT(A) was correct in deleting the additions. The Revenue failed to prove that the assessee trust violated Section 13(1)(c) by diverting funds or that the company was a specified concern for such violation.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order deleting additions made to the assessee trust's income. The additions were based on allegations of diversion of funds and violation of Section 13(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act concerning a CT scanner installed in a private company's premises.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in deleting additions related to alleged diversion of funds and violation of Section 13(1)(c) of the IT Act concerning the use of a CT scanner by a private company.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 13(1)(c),Section 11,Section 12,Section 147,Section 151
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. v. ITO1,349 citing259 ITR 19 · 2003 · SC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, A BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY & SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL
PER ABY T. VARKEY, JM: ITA Nos.1302 to 1304/Chny/2023 are the appeals preferred by the Revenue against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/NFAC, (hereinafter in short `the Ld.CIT(A)'), Delhi, all dated 22.09.2023 for the Assessment Years (hereinafter in short `AYs') 2014-15 to 2016-17 and CO Nos.1 to 3/Chny/2024 are
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 13(1)(c)
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Kankariya Foundation, Jaipur vs Exemption Ward 1, JaipurITA 578/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2025-26
- Kankariya Foundation, Jaipur vs Exemption Ward 1, JaipurITA 574/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2025-26
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026