THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S.M N RAMA RAO & CO
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court noted that the tax effect in the present appeals was below the enhanced limit of Rs. 20 lacs. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed in view of the circular.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed appeals before the High Court. The Central Board of Direct Taxes issued a circular enhancing the monetary limit for filing appeals to the High Court from Rs. 10 lacs to Rs. 20 lacs.
What were the issues?
Whether pending appeals with a tax effect below the enhanced monetary limit specified in a CBDT circular should be dismissed.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2015
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN
AND
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA
ITA No.826/2009 C/W ITA NO.827/2009
BETWEEN:
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, 55/1, SHILPASHREE, VIDYARANYA COMPLEX, VISHVESHWARANAGAR, MYSORE – 570 008.
THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE – 2 (1), BANGALORE. ... APPELLANTS (COMMON)
(BY SRI.K.V.ARAVIND & MS.PREETHI.J.D– ADVs)
AND
M/S M.N.RAMA RAO & CO., NO.18, VICTORIA ROAD, VIVEK NAGAR, BANGALORE. ... RESPONDENT (COMMON)
(BY SRI.A.SHANKAR & SRI.M.LAVA– ADVs)
THESE ITAs ARE FILED UNDER SECTION 260A OF INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE ITAT, BANGALORE IN ITA Nos.992/BNG/2008 AND 991/BNG/2008 RESPECTIVELY DATED: 24.7.2009, ETC.
THESE ITAs COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, VINEET SARAN J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellants-Revenue has placed before us a recent Circular No.21/2015 dated 10.12.2015, issued by the Central Board of Direct taxes, wherein the monetary limit of the tax effect for filing appeals before the High Court has been enhanced from Rs.10 lacs to Rs.20 lacs. In paragraph-10 of the said Circular, it has been clarified that the same will apply retrospectively to pending appeals also, which, if below the specified tax limits, may be withdrawn/not pressed.
Learned counsel for the appellants has stated that the tax effect in the present appeals is below the specified limit of Rs.20 lacs.
Accordingly, in view of the Circular No.21/2015 dated 10.12.2015, the tax effect in these appeals being less than Rs.20 lacs, the appeals stand dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE TL
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026